Michael O’Neal Campbell

561 citations
39 papers · 364 indexed · h-index 11

Michael O’Neal Campbell

34 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Michael O’Neal Campbell
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Ecological Modeling 36
  • Ecology 198
  • Geography, Planning and Development 41
  • Forestry 23
  • Developmental Biology 10
Replace Ricardo F. de Lima with:
Ricardo F. de Lima Portugal
Rena R. Borkhataria United States
Jeanetta Selier South Africa
Angela Gaylard South Africa
Andrés Muñoz-Pedreros Chile
Dave Balfour South Africa
Evan Bowen-Jones United Kingdom
Brandon P. Anthony Austria
Fernando R. Barri Argentina
Douglas Reiter United States
Michael O’Neal Campbell relative to Ricardo F. de Lima Portugal Ricardo F. de Lima's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Ricardo F. de Lima · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael O’Neal Campbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O’Neal Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O’Neal Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O’Neal Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O’Neal Campbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O’Neal Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O’Neal Campbell. The network helps show where Michael O’Neal Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Michael O’Neal Campbell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael O’Neal Campbell Line = papers co-authored together Michael O’Neal Campbell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20166
2 20154
3
The impact of urbanization and agricultural development on vultures in El Salvador
20144
4 20140
5
The Political Ecology of Agricultural History in Ghana
20134
6 20127
7 20115
8 201023
9
Public Attitudes toward Black Bears and Cougars on Vancouver Island
20100
10 20093
11 200911
12 20095
13 20085
14 20086
15 20086
16 200712
17 200536
18 20053
19 200510
20 20041

About Michael O’Neal Campbell

Michael O’Neal Campbell is a scholar working on Ecology, Forestry and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 39 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (7 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (6 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (4 papers) and African Botany and Ecology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (36 citations), Ecology (198 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (41 citations). Michael O’Neal Campbell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Elliott, Cameron G. Lait, John H. Borden, Max Longhurst, Cristina M. Machial, Aaron M. Duffy, Heath Beckett and Paul G. Wolf. Their work appears in journals such as Geoforum, Applied Geography and Urban forestry & urban greening.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026