Margaret Kettle

38 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Margaret Kettle
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Education 171
  • Literature and Literary Theory 78
  • Language and Linguistics 39
  • Political Science and International Relations 38
  • Information Systems 30
Replace Kate Chanock with:
Kate Chanock Australia
Martin Kustati Indonesia
Rany Sam Cambodia
Angela Choi Fung Tam Hong Kong
Tony Burner Norway
Mohammod Moninoor Roshid Bangladesh
María Elena Gómez Parra Spain
Sherran Clarence South Africa
Ekaterina Tour Australia
Kevin Wai Ho Yung Hong Kong
Margaret Kettle relative to Kate Chanock Australia Kate Chanock's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Kate Chanock · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Kettle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Kettle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Kettle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Kettle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Kettle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Kettle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Kettle. The network helps show where Margaret Kettle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Kettle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Kettle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Kettle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Kettle. Margaret Kettle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 3
3 0
4 1
5 2
6 3
7 0
8
Using Corpus Analysis in a Needs Analysis of Key English Vocabulary for Petroleum Engineers in Vietnam
0
9 23
10 2
11 12
12
The vexed issue of written corrective feedback: English language teachers using theory to improve practice
1
13 11
14 12
15 4
16 4
17 2
18
Rethinking comprehension and strategy use in second language listening instruction
0
19
Teaching grammar: rethinking the approach
1
20
Critical discourse analysis and hybrid texts: Analysing english as a second language
6

About Margaret Kettle

Margaret Kettle is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Linguistics and Language, having authored 46 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Education and Multiculturalism (13 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (12 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (78 citations), Education (171 citations) and Linguistics and Language (20 citations). Margaret Kettle has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Lyn May, Val Klenowski, Keita Takayama, Gert Biesta, Stephen Heimans, Jennifer Alford, Barbara Comber, Sue Creagh, Catherine Doherty and Allan Luke. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Orthodontics, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026