Kevin Ashford-Rowe
-
- Online Learning and Analytics 1
- Health Informatics top 10%
- Education top 5%
- Online and Blended Learning 6
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices 4
- Higher Education Learning Practices 3
- Student Assessment and Feedback 2
- Information Systems top 10%
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 2
-
- Engineering Education and Curriculum Development 2
-
- Social Media and Politics 1
In The Last Decade
Kevin Ashford-Rowe
16 papers receiving 472 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Computer Science Applications 105
- Health Informatics 15
- Education 306
- Human Factors and Ergonomics 12
- Information Systems 105
Countries citing papers authored by Kevin Ashford-Rowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Kevin Ashford-Rowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kevin Ashford-Rowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kevin Ashford-Rowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kevin Ashford-Rowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kevin Ashford-Rowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kevin Ashford-Rowe. The network helps show where Kevin Ashford-Rowe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Kevin Ashford-Rowe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 7 | Horizon Report2019 Higher Education Edition | 2019 | 42 |
| 8 | EDUCAUSE Horizon Report: 2019 Higher Education Edition. | 2019 | 176 |
| 9 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 11 | Socio-economic status and students' experiences of technologies: Is there a digital divide? | 2014 | 1 |
| 12 | Student use of technologies for learning - what has changed since 2010? | 2014 | 7 |
| 13 | 2013 | 217 | |
| 14 | EMERGING EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL DECISION-MAKING MATRIX | 2010 | 2 |
| 15 | A heuristic framework for the determination of the critical elements in authentic assessment | 2009 | 2 |
| 16 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 17 | Benchmarking across universities: A framework for LMS analysis | 2009 | 7 |
| 18 | Applying a design-based research approach to the determination and application of the critical elements of an authentic assessment | 2008 | 2 |
About Kevin Ashford-Rowe
Kevin Ashford-Rowe is a scholar working on Education, Media Technology and Computer Science Applications, having authored 18 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (6 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (4 papers), Higher Education Learning Practices (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (2 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers), Social Media and Politics (1 paper) and Online Learning and Analytics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (105 citations), Health Informatics (15 citations) and Education (306 citations). Kevin Ashford-Rowe has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jan Herrington, Christine Brown, Mark McCormack, Bryan Alexander, Nicole Weber, Jessica L. Knott, Janne Malfroy, Kïrsten A. Way, Jason M. Lodge and Maree Gosper.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.