Kathryn Coleman

31 papers receiving 153 citations

Peers

Kathryn Coleman
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Education 93
  • Sociology and Political Science 23
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 23
  • Clinical Psychology 18
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 16
Replace Andrew Skourdoumbis with:
Andrew Skourdoumbis Australia
Bruce A. Marlowe
Felicity McArdle Australia
André Coelho da Silva Brazil
Kathleen Cushman United States
Sonja Baumer United States
Ana Mouraz Portugal
Clive McGee New Zealand
Andrea Edwards United States
Steven Wolk United States
Kathryn Coleman relative to Andrew Skourdoumbis Australia Andrew Skourdoumbis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Andrew Skourdoumbis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathryn Coleman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathryn Coleman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathryn Coleman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathryn Coleman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathryn Coleman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathryn Coleman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathryn Coleman. The network helps show where Kathryn Coleman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathryn Coleman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathryn Coleman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathryn Coleman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathryn Coleman. Kathryn Coleman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 4
2 19
3 8
4 8
5 37
6
Art education during the COVID-19 lockdown
5
7
Exploring the Interface of Oncology and Palliative Care in Ireland
1
8 1
9 1
10 1
11
Eportfolios in the Sciences: The Role of Reflection as students build professional skills and career readiness
3
12
Creativity in practice: social media in higher education
11
13 1
14 1
15
Authentic assessment in elearning: Reflective and Collaborative writing in the arts
6
16 0
17
The creative graduate: cultivating and assessing creativity with eportfolios
8
18 1
19 1
20 1

About Kathryn Coleman

Kathryn Coleman is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Computer Science Applications and Education, having authored 35 papers that have together received 168 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reflective Practices in Education (8 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (93 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (14 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (5 citations). Kathryn Coleman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Melissa Cain, Chris Campbell, Louise Gwenneth Phillips, Geraldine Burke, Jenny Ritchie, Susan Davis, Cynthia H. Brock, Tam Nguyen, Anne Harris and Helen Caple. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Geographical Journal and Qualitative Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026