Helen Caple

2.2k citations
37 papers · 1.2k · 1 hit paper · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Helen Caple

37 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Helen Caple's Hit Papers

The Discourse of News Values 2017 · 158 citations
1580+3+6Years since publication50100150

Peers

Helen Caple
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Communication 576
  • Literature and Literary Theory 367
  • Philosophy 155
  • Linguistics and Language 61
  • Gender Studies 126
Replace Mike Scott with:
Mike Scott United Kingdom
Kim Christian Schrøder Denmark
Brian L. Ott United States
Akiba A. Cohen Israel
Damian J. Rivers Japan
Paddy Scannell United States
Oliver Boyd‐Barrett United States
Knut Lundby Norway
Mervi Pantti Finland
Jason Mittell United States
Helen Caple relative to Mike Scott United Kingdom Mike Scott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mike Scott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Caple

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Caple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Caple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Caple more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Caple

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Caple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Caple. The network helps show where Helen Caple may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Helen Caple, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Caple Line = papers co-authored together Helen Caple links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014193
2
The Discourse of News Values
Hit paper breakdown →
2017158
3 201599
4 201289
5 201776
6 201370
7 201547
8 201141
9 202040
10 201236
11 201035
12
Delving into the discourse: approaches to news values in journalism studies and beyond
201332
13 201132
14 202130
15 201528
16
Towards a level playing field: sport and gender in Australian media
201026
17 201418
18 201315
19 202115
20 202111

About Helen Caple

Helen Caple is a scholar working on Communication, Literature and Literary Theory, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Gender Studies, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (15 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (13 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (4 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers) and Sports, Gender, and Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (576 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (367 citations), Philosophy (155 citations), Linguistics and Language (61 citations) and Gender Studies (126 citations). Helen Caple has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Monika Bednarek, John S. Knox, Changpeng Huan, Catharine Lumby, Amanda Potts, Kathryn Coleman, Tam Nguyen, Laurence Anthony and Hartmut Stöckl. Their work appears in journals such as Visual Communication, Discourse Context & Media, Discourse & Communication, Social Semiotics and Journalism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact