Jo Ellen Roseman

1.1k total citations
23 papers, 736 citations indexed

About

Jo Ellen Roseman is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Jo Ellen Roseman has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 736 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Education, 8 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 6 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Jo Ellen Roseman's work include Science Education and Pedagogy (15 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (6 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (6 papers). Jo Ellen Roseman is often cited by papers focused on Science Education and Pedagogy (15 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (6 papers) and Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (6 papers). Jo Ellen Roseman collaborates with scholars based in United States and Israel. Jo Ellen Roseman's co-authors include Sofia Kesidou, Luli Stern, Cari F. Herrmann‐Abell, Kimberly A. Kaphingst, Belén Hurlé, Toby Citrin, Yael Kali, Marcia C. Linn, Neil E. Lamb and Jean Jenkins and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Genetics in Medicine and The Elementary School Journal.

In The Last Decade

Jo Ellen Roseman

20 papers receiving 626 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jo Ellen Roseman United States	10	553	275	101	78	78	23	736
Cynthia Passmore United States	10	616 1.1×	427 1.6×	43 0.4×	143 1.8×	15 0.2×	25	810
Fred N. Finley United States	13	664 1.2×	331 1.2×	61 0.6×	237 3.0×	18 0.2×	27	838
Amos Dreyfus Israel	12	480 0.9×	277 1.0×	66 0.7×	115 1.5×	12 0.2×	50	654
Jay B. Labov United States	13	428 0.8×	76 0.3×	49 0.5×	66 0.8×	16 0.2×	31	681
María Pilar Jiménez‐Aleixandre Spain	14	758 1.4×	544 2.0×	61 0.6×	110 1.4×	9 0.1×	33	934
J. J. Lagowski United States	9	586 1.1×	301 1.1×	104 1.0×	81 1.0×	7 0.1×	55	786
Susan M. Kowalski United States	7	308 0.6×	153 0.6×	62 0.6×	29 0.4×	24 0.3×	14	429
Matthew Kloser United States	12	485 0.9×	163 0.6×	39 0.4×	57 0.7×	6 0.1×	22	700
Mark Hackling Australia	16	1.0k 1.8×	447 1.6×	115 1.1×	91 1.2×	5 0.1×	54	1.2k
Ann M. L. Cavallo United States	11	520 0.9×	238 0.9×	90 0.9×	167 2.1×	5 0.1×	23	723

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Ellen Roseman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Ellen Roseman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Ellen Roseman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Ellen Roseman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Ellen Roseman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Ellen Roseman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Ellen Roseman. The network helps show where Jo Ellen Roseman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo Ellen Roseman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo Ellen Roseman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo Ellen Roseman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo Ellen Roseman. Jo Ellen Roseman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Homburger, Sheila A., Molly Malone, N. Barber, et al.. (2019). Development and pilot testing of a three-dimensional, phenomenon-based unit that integrates evolution and heredity. Evolution Education and Outreach. 12(1). 8 indexed citations

Roseman, Jo Ellen, et al.. (2017). Designing for the Next Generation Science Standards: Educative Curriculum Materials and Measures of Teacher Knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 28(1). 111–141. 22 indexed citations

Herrmann‐Abell, Cari F., et al.. (2016). Toward High School Biology: Helping Middle School Students Understand Chemical Reactions and Conservation of Mass in Nonliving and Living Systems. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 15(4). ar74–ar74. 12 indexed citations

Roseman, Jo Ellen, et al.. (2015). Aligned-or Not?.. Educational leadership. 72(4). 24–27.

Hurlé, Belén, Toby Citrin, Jean Jenkins, et al.. (2013). What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report. Genetics in Medicine. 15(8). 658–663. 91 indexed citations

Herrmann‐Abell, Cari F., et al.. (2013). Developing and Evaluating an Eighth Grade Curriculum Unit That Links Foundational Chemistry to Biological Growth: Paper 5--Using Teacher Measures to Evaluate the Promise of the Intervention.. 6 indexed citations

Roseman, Jo Ellen, et al.. (2013). Developing and Evaluating an Eighth Grade Curriculum Unit That Links Foundational Chemistry to Biological Growth Paper #1: Selecting Core Ideas and Practices - An Iterative Process. 3 indexed citations

Kruse, Rebecca, Elaine V. Howes, Janet Carlson, et al.. (2013). Developing and Evaluating an Eighth Grade Curriculum Unit That Links Foundational Chemistry to Biological Growth: Changing the Research-Based Curriculum.. 3 indexed citations

Herrmann‐Abell, Cari F., et al.. (2012). Results from a Pilot Study of a Curriculum Unit Designed to Help Middle School Students Understand Chemical Reactions in Living Systems.. 5 indexed citations

10.

Roseman, Jo Ellen, et al.. (2011). Assessing middle and high school students' understanding of evolution with standards-based items. 5 indexed citations

11.

Roseman, Jo Ellen, et al.. (2010). Probing Students' Ideas about Models Using Standards-Based Assessment Items. 3 indexed citations

12.

Roseman, Jo Ellen, et al.. (2010). The brain in science education: what should everyone learn?. PubMed. 2010. 16–16. 2 indexed citations

13.

Roseman, Jo Ellen, et al.. (2009). A method for analyzing the coherence of high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 47(1). 47–70. 75 indexed citations

14.

Kali, Yael, Marcia C. Linn, & Jo Ellen Roseman. (2008). Designing coherent science education : implications for curriculum, instruction, and policy. 38 indexed citations

15.

Roseman, Jo Ellen, et al.. (2008). Using National Standards to Improve K–8 Science Curriculum Materials. The Elementary School Journal. 109(2). 104–122. 9 indexed citations

16.

Stern, Luli & Jo Ellen Roseman. (2004). Can middle‐school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41(6). 538–568. 151 indexed citations

17.

DeBoer, George E., Kathleen Morris, Jo Ellen Roseman, et al.. (2004). Research Issues in the Improvement of Mathematics Teaching and Learning through Professional Development. 10 indexed citations

18.

Kesidou, Sofia & Jo Ellen Roseman. (2003). Project 2061 analyses of middle‐school science textbooks: A response to holliday. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 40(5). 535–543. 15 indexed citations

19.

Kesidou, Sofia & Jo Ellen Roseman. (2002). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 39(6). 522–549. 265 indexed citations

20.

Roseman, Jo Ellen. (1997). Lessons from Project 2061.. The Science Teacher. 64(1). 26–29. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact