Janet Carlson

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 664 citations indexed

About

Janet Carlson is a scholar working on Education, Information Systems and Management and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Carlson has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 664 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Education, 4 papers in Information Systems and Management and 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Janet Carlson's work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (7 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (7 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (5 papers). Janet Carlson is often cited by papers focused on Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (7 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (7 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (5 papers). Janet Carlson collaborates with scholars based in United States and Nepal. Janet Carlson's co-authors include Christopher D. Wilson, J. Ashley Taylor, Susan M. Kowalski, Molly A. M. Stuhlsatz, April L. Gardner, Julie Gess‐Newsome, Sarah Schneider Kavanagh, Mark Windschitl, Hilda Borko and Elizabeth A. Davis and has published in prestigious journals such as American Educational Research Journal, Teaching and Teacher Education and Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

In The Last Decade

Janet Carlson

14 papers receiving 610 citations

Hit Papers

Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and stud... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200
What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

  1. Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement
    2017 222 citations Julie Gess‐Newsome, J. Ashley Taylor et al. International Journal of Science Education profile →

Peers

Janet Carlson
Meredith Park Rogers United States
Hanna Westbroek Netherlands
Lorena Llosa United States
Wayne Melville Canada
Marcelle A. Siegel United States
Kennedy Kam Ho Chan Hong Kong
Anne Hogaboam‐Gray Canada
Marlow Ediger United States
Ling L. Liang United States
Ineke Henze Netherlands
Meredith Park Rogers United States
Janet Carlson
Citations per year, relative to Janet Carlson Janet Carlson (= 1×) peers Meredith Park Rogers

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Carlson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Carlson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Carlson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Carlson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Carlson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Carlson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Carlson. The network helps show where Janet Carlson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Carlson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Carlson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Carlson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Carlson. Janet Carlson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Carlson, Janet, et al.. (2023). High school mathematics teachers' noticing of inequitable talk. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 27(4). 551–578.
2.
Dyer, Elizabeth, et al.. (2022). Teachers’ engagement with student mathematical agency and authority in school-based professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education. 121. 103881–103881. 5 indexed citations
3.
Borko, Hilda, et al.. (2021). Learning to Lead: an Approach to Mathematics Teacher Leader Development. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 19(S1). 121–143. 21 indexed citations
4.
Carlson, Janet, et al.. (2021). Science Teacher Noticing via Video Annotation: Links between Complexity and Knowledge-Based Reasoning. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 33(7). 744–763. 11 indexed citations
5.
Kavanagh, Sarah Schneider, et al.. (2019). Practicing Responsiveness: Using Approximations of Teaching to Develop Teachers’ Responsiveness to Students’ Ideas. Journal of Teacher Education. 71(1). 94–107. 88 indexed citations
6.
Borko, Hilda, et al.. (2017). The role of video-based discussion in model for preparing professional development leaders. International Journal of STEM Education. 4(1). 29–29. 24 indexed citations
7.
Gess‐Newsome, Julie, J. Ashley Taylor, Janet Carlson, et al.. (2017). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education. 41(7). 944–963. 222 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Davis, Elizabeth A., et al.. (2017). Teaching the Practice of Leading Sense-Making Discussions in Science: Science Teacher Educators Using Rehearsals. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 28(3). 275–293. 37 indexed citations
9.
Taylor, J. Ashley, et al.. (2015). An Efficacy Trial of Research-Based Curriculum Materials With Curriculum-Based Professional Development. American Educational Research Journal. 52(5). 984–1017. 3 indexed citations
10.
Roseman, Jo Ellen, et al.. (2013). Developing and Evaluating an Eighth Grade Curriculum Unit That Links Foundational Chemistry to Biological Growth Paper #1: Selecting Core Ideas and Practices - An Iterative Process. 3 indexed citations
11.
Kruse, Rebecca, et al.. (2013). Developing and Evaluating an Eighth Grade Curriculum Unit That Links Foundational Chemistry to Biological Growth: Designing Professional Development to Support Teaching.. 4 indexed citations
12.
Kruse, Rebecca, Elaine V. Howes, Janet Carlson, et al.. (2013). Developing and Evaluating an Eighth Grade Curriculum Unit That Links Foundational Chemistry to Biological Growth: Changing the Research-Based Curriculum.. 3 indexed citations
13.
Taylor, J. Ashley, Susan M. Kowalski, Christopher D. Wilson, Stephen R. Getty, & Janet Carlson. (2013). Conducting causal effects studies in science education: Considering methodological trade‐offs in the context of policies affecting research in schools. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 50(9). 1127–1141. 10 indexed citations
14.
Wilson, Christopher D., J. Ashley Taylor, Susan M. Kowalski, & Janet Carlson. (2009). The Relative Effects of Inquiry-Based and Commonplace Science Teaching on Students' Knowledge, Reasoning and Argumentation about Sleep Concepts: A Randomized Control Trial.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 4 indexed citations
15.
Wilson, Christopher D., J. Ashley Taylor, Susan M. Kowalski, & Janet Carlson. (2009). The relative effects and equity of inquiry‐based and commonplace science teaching on students' knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 47(3). 276–301. 222 indexed citations
16.
Bybee, Rodger W., Janet Carlson, & Alan J. McCormack. (1989). Redesigning science and technology education. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Meredith Park Rogers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hanna Westbroek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lorena Llosa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wayne Melville Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marcelle A. Siegel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kennedy Kam Ho Chan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anne Hogaboam‐Gray Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marlow Ediger Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ling L. Liang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ineke Henze
Rankless by CCL
2026