Jill Denner
- Computer Science Applications top 0.05%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 1%
- Education top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Co-authors
- Linda WernerShannon CampeEloy OrtizCatherine R. CooperIrene LeeFred MartinBob CoulterWalter C. Allan
- Topics
- Teaching and Learning Programming (35 papers)Gender and Technology in Education (20 papers)Educational Games and Gamification (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSweden
In The Last Decade
Jill Denner
76 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Computer Science Applications 1.5k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 915
- Education 646
- Sociology and Political Science 466
- Gender Studies 325
Countries citing papers authored by Jill Denner
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Denner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Denner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Denner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Denner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Denner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Denner. The network helps show where Jill Denner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill Denner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill Denner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill Denner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jill Denner. Jill Denner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | Using computer game programming to teach computational thinking skills | 15 |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 124 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | Computational Thinking in K-12: Defining the Space | 2 |
| 12 | The Girl Game Company: Engaging Latina Girls in Information Technology | 22 |
| 13 | The Role of the Family in the IT Career Goals of Middle School Latinas. | 5 |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | Latina girls : voices of adolescent strength in the United States | 24 |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 135 |
About Jill Denner
Jill Denner is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Gender Studies and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (35 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (20 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (1.5k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (915 citations) and Gender Studies (325 citations). Jill Denner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Linda Werner, Shannon Campe, Eloy Ortiz, Catherine R. Cooper, Irene Lee, Fred Martin, Bob Coulter, Walter C. Allan, Joyce Malyn‐Smith and Karin Coyle. Their work appears in journals such as Annual Review of Psychology, Communications of the ACM and Computers & Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.