Jill Denner

3.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
78 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Jill Denner is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Education and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Jill Denner has authored 78 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Computer Science Applications, 31 papers in Education and 23 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Jill Denner's work include Teaching and Learning Programming (35 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (20 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (16 papers). Jill Denner is often cited by papers focused on Teaching and Learning Programming (35 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (20 papers) and Educational Games and Gamification (16 papers). Jill Denner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. Jill Denner's co-authors include Linda Werner, Shannon Campe, Eloy Ortiz, Catherine R. Cooper, Irene Lee, Fred Martin, Bob Coulter, Walter C. Allan, Joyce Malyn‐Smith and Karin Coyle and has published in prestigious journals such as Annual Review of Psychology, Communications of the ACM and Computers & Education.

In The Last Decade

Jill Denner

76 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Hit Papers

Computational thinking for youth in practice 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jill Denner United States 25 1.5k 915 646 466 325 78 2.6k
Duane F. Shell United States 26 480 0.3× 893 1.0× 900 1.4× 174 0.4× 123 0.4× 86 2.7k
Steven L. Wise United States 30 383 0.3× 676 0.7× 1.4k 2.2× 471 1.0× 157 0.5× 112 4.1k
Albert D. Ritzhaupt United States 31 716 0.5× 690 0.8× 2.0k 3.1× 282 0.6× 361 1.1× 122 3.2k
Ellen B. Mandinach United States 24 476 0.3× 717 0.8× 1.3k 2.1× 199 0.4× 107 0.3× 71 3.3k
Janette R. Hill United States 19 541 0.4× 920 1.0× 1.8k 2.8× 278 0.6× 92 0.3× 50 2.6k
Di Xu United States 27 707 0.5× 342 0.4× 1.9k 3.0× 235 0.5× 82 0.3× 85 2.6k
Kui Xie United States 30 604 0.4× 998 1.1× 1.8k 2.7× 303 0.7× 193 0.6× 79 2.7k
Yukie Toyama United States 8 816 0.5× 670 0.7× 2.5k 3.8× 237 0.5× 65 0.2× 13 3.3k
Andrew Walker United States 21 562 0.4× 769 0.8× 1.9k 2.9× 291 0.6× 77 0.2× 44 2.8k
Kara Dawson United States 25 348 0.2× 410 0.4× 1.3k 2.0× 347 0.7× 251 0.8× 112 2.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Jill Denner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Denner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Denner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Denner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Denner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Denner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Denner. The network helps show where Jill Denner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill Denner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill Denner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill Denner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jill Denner. Jill Denner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Denner, Jill, et al.. (2020). Teacher expectations and perceived teacher involvement anticipate changes in Latino/a middle school students’ expectations of math success. Educational Psychology. 41(6). 786–805. 7 indexed citations
3.
Denner, Jill & David Torres. (2020). How Natural Mentoring is Used by Latinx Youth at a Community Technology Center. Journal of Latinos and Education. 22(1). 339–356.
4.
Laursen, Brett, et al.. (2016). Maternal Psychological Control and Its Association with Mother and Child Perceptions of Adolescent Adjustment: More Evidence on the Strength of Shared Perspectives. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 45(10). 2151–2163. 14 indexed citations
5.
Ruvalcaba, Omar, Linda Werner, & Jill Denner. (2016). Observations of Pair Programming. 90–95. 19 indexed citations
6.
Hartl, Amy C., Dawn DeLay, Brett Laursen, et al.. (2015). Dyadic instruction for middle school students: Liking promotes learning. Learning and Individual Differences. 44. 33–39. 20 indexed citations
7.
Werner, Linda, Jill Denner, & Shannon Campe. (2014). Using computer game programming to teach computational thinking skills. 37–53. 15 indexed citations
8.
Anderson, Pamela M., et al.. (2014). An Exploratory Study of Adolescent Pimping Relationships. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 35(2). 113–117. 37 indexed citations
9.
Denner, Jill, Linda Werner, Shannon Campe, & Eloy Ortiz. (2014). Pair Programming: Under What Conditions Is It Advantageous for Middle School Students?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 46(3). 277–296. 124 indexed citations
10.
Coyle, Karin, et al.. (2013). Interventions to Reduce Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Youth in Alternative Schools: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Adolescent Health. 53(1). 68–78. 28 indexed citations
11.
Malyn‐Smith, Joyce, Bob Coulter, Jill Denner, et al.. (2010). Computational Thinking in K-12: Defining the Space. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2010(1). 3479–3484. 2 indexed citations
12.
Denner, Jill, et al.. (2009). The Girl Game Company: Engaging Latina Girls in Information Technology. 8. 26–35. 22 indexed citations
13.
Denner, Jill. (2009). The Role of the Family in the IT Career Goals of Middle School Latinas.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 20(39). 334–43. 5 indexed citations
14.
Denner, Jill & Linda Werner. (2007). Computer Programming in Middle School: How Pairs Respond to Challenges. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 37(2). 131–150. 34 indexed citations
15.
Denner, Jill & Bianca L. Guzmán. (2006). Latina girls : voices of adolescent strength in the United States. New York University Press eBooks. 24 indexed citations
16.
Denner, Jill, Karin Coyle, Leah Robin, & Stephen W. Banspach. (2005). Integrating Service Learning into a Curriculum to Reduce Health Risks at Alternative High Schools. Journal of School Health. 75(5). 151–156. 9 indexed citations
17.
Denner, Jill, et al.. (2005). Predictors of HIV Transmission Among Migrant and Marginally Housed Latinos. AIDS and Behavior. 9(2). 201–210. 40 indexed citations
18.
Meyer, Beth, et al.. (2004). VI. The Interplay of Leadership and Friendship in the Young Women’s Leadership Alliance. Feminism & Psychology. 14(3). 389–394. 3 indexed citations
19.
Denner, Jill, Catherine R. Cooper, Edward M. Lopez, & Nora Dunbar. (1999). Beyond “Giving Science Away”: How University-Community Partnerships Inform Youth Programs, Research, and Policy. 13(1). 1–20. 32 indexed citations
20.
Cooper, Catherine R. & Jill Denner. (1998). THEORIES LINKING CULTURE AND PSYCHOLOGY: Universal and Community-Specific Processes. Annual Review of Psychology. 49(1). 559–584. 135 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026