Annual Review of Psychology

1.9k papers and 401.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Annual Review of Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 401.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Annual Review of Psychology usually cover Social Psychology (400 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (363 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (263 papers) specifically the topics of Cultural Differences and Values (132 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (109 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annual Review of Psychology are Albert Bandura, Adele Diamond, Henri Tajfel, J. A. Graham, John M. Digman, Thomas F. Pettigrew, Scott MacKenzie, Philip M. Podsakoff, Nathan P. Podsakoff and Lawrence W. Barsalou.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annual Review of Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annual Review of Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annual Review of Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Annual Review of Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annual Review of Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annual Review of Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annual Review of Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025