Countries citing papers authored by James J. Kaput
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James J. Kaput's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James J. Kaput with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James J. Kaput more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James J. Kaput. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James J. Kaput. The network helps show where James J. Kaput may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James J. Kaput
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James J. Kaput.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James J. Kaput based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James J. Kaput. James J. Kaput is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stylianou, Despina A., Beverly Smith, & James J. Kaput. (2005). Math in motion: Using CBRs to enact functions. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching. 24(3). 299–324.8 indexed citations
5.
Blanton, Maria & James J. Kaput. (2004). Elementary Grades Students' Capacity for Functional Thinking.. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference.77 indexed citations
6.
Hegedus, Stephen & James J. Kaput. (2004). An Introduction to the Profound Potential of Connected Algebra Activities: Issues of Representation, Engagement and Pedagogy.. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 2004(1).24 indexed citations
7.
Stroup, Walter M., et al.. (2002). THE NATURE AND FUTURE OF CLASSROOM CONNECTIVITY: THE DIALECTICS OF MATHEMATICS IN THE SOCIAL SPACE.22 indexed citations
8.
Kaput, James J. & Maria Blanton. (2000). Algebraic Reasoning in the Context of Elementary Mathematics: Making It Implementable on a Massive Scale..9 indexed citations
9.
Kaput, James J.. (2000). Teaching and Learning a New Algebra with Understanding..61 indexed citations
Roschelle, Jeremy & James J. Kaput. (1996). Educational Software Architecture and Systematic Impact: The Promise of Component Software.. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 14(3).11 indexed citations
Kaput, James J.. (1995). A Research Base Supporting Long Term Algebra Reform.27 indexed citations
15.
Kaput, James J. & Ed Dubinsky. (1994). Research issues in undergraduate mathematics learning : preliminary analyses and results.21 indexed citations
16.
Kaput, James J.. (1989). Supporting Concrete Visual Thinking in Multiplicative Reasoning: Difficulties and Opportunities.. Focus on learning problems in mathematics. 11. 35–47.6 indexed citations
17.
Kaput, James J.. (1986). Information Technology and Mathematics: Opening New Representational Windows.. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 5(2). 187–207.38 indexed citations
18.
Kaput, James J.. (1985). Multiplicative Word Problems and Intensive Quantities: An Integrated Software Response. Technical Report 85-19..15 indexed citations
19.
Fleming, Daniel, James J. Kaput, & John Foster. (1979). Calculus with analytic geometry. Harper & Row eBooks.1 indexed citations
20.
Kaput, James J.. (1972). Locally adjuntable functors. Illinois Journal of Mathematics. 16(1).9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.