This map shows the geographic impact of Maria Blanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria Blanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria Blanton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria Blanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria Blanton. The network helps show where Maria Blanton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria Blanton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria Blanton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria Blanton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Maria Blanton. Maria Blanton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stephens, Ana C., et al.. (2017). The Interplay between Students' Understandings of Proportional and Functional Relationships.. OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University).3 indexed citations
5.
Blanton, Maria, Angela Murphy Gardiner, Işıl Işler, Ana C. Stephens, & Eric Knuth. (2016). A Longitudinal Study of Elementary Students' Use of Variable Notation to Represent Mathematical Generalizations.. OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University).1 indexed citations
6.
Stephens, Ana C., et al.. (2016). Elementary Students' Generalization and Representation of Functional Relationships: A Learning Progressions Approach.. Grantee Submission.1 indexed citations
7.
Stephens, Ana C., et al.. (2015). A Learning Progressions Approach to Early Algebra Research and Practice.. Grantee Submission.3 indexed citations
Stephens, Ana C., et al.. (2012). From Recursive Pattern to Correspondence Rule: Developing Students' Abilities to Engage in Functional Thinking. OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University).10 indexed citations
11.
Işler, Işıl, et al.. (2011). From Specific Value to Variable: Developing Students' Abilities to Represent Unknowns.. OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University).9 indexed citations
Stylianou, Despina A., et al.. (2006). Students proof schemes: A closer look at what characterizes students proof conceptions. 1–7.9 indexed citations
14.
Blanton, Maria & James J. Kaput. (2004). Elementary Grades Students' Capacity for Functional Thinking.. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference.77 indexed citations
15.
Blanton, Maria, et al.. (2003). The Nature of Scaffolding in Undergraduate Students' Transition to Mathematical Proof.. Proceedings of the ... PME Conference. 2. 113–120.17 indexed citations
Kaput, James J. & Maria Blanton. (2000). Algebraic Reasoning in the Context of Elementary Mathematics: Making It Implementable on a Massive Scale..9 indexed citations
18.
Blanton, Maria, Sarah B. Berenson, & Karen S. Norwood. (1999). Exploring a Pedagogy for Educative Supervision..1 indexed citations
19.
Berenson, Sarah B., et al.. (1999). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (20th, Raleigh, NC, October 31-November 3, 1998). Volume 1..2 indexed citations
20.
Blanton, Maria. (1991). Teaching Reading in the Math Classroom. The Clearing House A Journal of Educational Strategies Issues and Ideas. 64(3). 162–164.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.