Jamal Abedi
About
In The Last Decade
Jamal Abedi
79 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Education 1.9k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 962
- Linguistics and Language 540
- Language and Linguistics 460
- Literature and Literary Theory 390
Countries citing papers authored by Jamal Abedi
This map shows the geographic impact of Jamal Abedi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamal Abedi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamal Abedi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jamal Abedi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamal Abedi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamal Abedi. The network helps show where Jamal Abedi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jamal Abedi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jamal Abedi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jamal Abedi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jamal Abedi. Jamal Abedi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | Fairness in Assessment of English Learners. | 10 |
| 3 | Accessible Reading Assessments for Students with Disabilities: The Role of Cognitive, Grammatical, Lexical, and Textual/Visual Features. CRESST Report 785. | 5 |
| 4 | 62 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | Exploring Factors that Affect the Accessibility of Reading Comprehension Assessments for Students with Disabilities: A Study of Segmented Text. CRESST Report 746. | 1 |
| 7 | Examining Differential Item Functioning in Reading Assessments for Students with Disabilities. CRESST Report 744. | 6 |
| 8 | Providing Validity Evidence to Improve the Assessment of English Language Learners. CRESST Report 738. | 9 |
| 9 | Examining Differential Distractor Functioning in Reading Assessments for Students with Disabilities. CRESST Report 743. | 7 |
| 10 | English Language Learners and Math Achievement: A Study of Opportunity to Learn and Language Accommodation. Technical Report 702. | 15 |
| 11 | The Validity of Administering Large-Scale Content Assessments to English Language Learners: An Investigation from Three Perspectives. CSE Report 663. | 15 |
| 12 | Language Accommodations for English Language Learners in Large-Scale Assessments: Bilingual Dictionaries and Linguistic Modification. CSE Report 666. | 34 |
| 13 | Issues in Assessing English Language Learners' Opportunity To Learn Mathematics. CSE Report 633. | 3 |
| 14 | Monetary Incentives for Low-Stakes Tests. CSE Report 625. | 0 |
| 15 | Will You Explain the Question | 5 |
| 16 | Research-Supported Accommodation for English Language Learners in NAEP. CSE Technical Report. | 24 |
| 17 | The Effects of Accommodations on the Assessment of LEP Students in NAEP. Working Paper Series. Working Paper No. 2001-13. | 1 |
| 18 | Monetary Initiatives for Low-Stakes Tests. | 2 |
| 19 | Test-Retest Reliability of Computer Based MCW-APM Test Scoring Methods. | 1 |
| 20 | 8 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.