Iris Howley

1.0k citations
27 papers · 557 indexed · h-index 11

Iris Howley

26 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers

Iris Howley
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Computer Science Applications 213
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 171
  • Human-Computer Interaction 38
  • Education 174
  • Artificial Intelligence 184
Replace Amy M. Johnson with:
Amy M. Johnson United States
François Bouchet France
Erin Walker United States
Carrie Demmans Epp Canada
Eric Poitras Canada
Gaoxia Zhu Singapore
Martin Muehlenbrock Germany
Amy Soller United States
Jessica Andrews‐Todd United States
Oliver Scheuer Germany
Iris Howley relative to Amy M. Johnson United States Amy M. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Amy M. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iris Howley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iris Howley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iris Howley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iris Howley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iris Howley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iris Howley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iris Howley. The network helps show where Iris Howley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iris Howley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iris Howley Line = papers co-authored together Iris Howley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20260
2 20209
3 202010
4 20193
5
Empirical Evidence for Evaluation Anxiety and Expectancy-Value Theory for Help Sources.
20183
6 20182
7 20164
8 201515
9
Challenges and Opportunities of Dual-Layer MOOCs: Reflections from an edX Deployment Study
201523
10 201576
11 201589
12
Forum Thread Recommendation for Massive Open Online Courses
201456
13 201429
14 201310
15 201343
16 201315
17 201127
18 20095
19 20092
20 20071

About Iris Howley

Iris Howley is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 27 papers that have together received 557 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (11 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (6 papers), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (5 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (3 papers), Digital Communication and Language (2 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (213 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (171 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (38 citations). Iris Howley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Carolyn Penstein Rosé, Diyi Yang, Takayuki Kanda, Kotaro Hayashi, Lauren Β. Resnick, Sherice N. Clarke, Masahiro Shiomi, Norihiro Hagita, Miaomiao Wen and Robert E. Kraut. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, Journal of Learning Analytics, Information and Learning Sciences, International Journal of Social Robotics and Learning Culture and Social Interaction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026