Hans‐Georg Wolff
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Klaus MoserSowon KimMonica L. ForretAnja S. GöritzSherry E. SullivanJudith VolmerBernad BatinicDaniel G. Goldstein
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers)Social Capital and Networks (8 papers)Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Hans‐Georg Wolff
33 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Sociology and Political Science 414
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 384
- Social Psychology 237
- Education 215
- Clinical Psychology 170
Countries citing papers authored by Hans‐Georg Wolff
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans‐Georg Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans‐Georg Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans‐Georg Wolff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans‐Georg Wolff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans‐Georg Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans‐Georg Wolff. The network helps show where Hans‐Georg Wolff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans‐Georg Wolff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans‐Georg Wolff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans‐Georg Wolff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans‐Georg Wolff. Hans‐Georg Wolff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 344 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 45 | |
| 19 | 134 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Hans‐Georg Wolff
Hans‐Georg Wolff is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Applied Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Social Capital and Networks (8 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (384 citations), Communication (160 citations) and Safety Research (107 citations). Hans‐Georg Wolff has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Moser, Sowon Kim, Monica L. Forret, Anja S. Göritz, Sherry E. Sullivan, Judith Volmer, Bernad Batinic, Daniel G. Goldstein, Daniel Spurk and Thomas Höge. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Vocational Behavior and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.