H. David Smith

413 total citations
18 papers, 294 citations indexed

About

H. David Smith is a scholar working on Education, Biomedical Engineering and Media Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, H. David Smith has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 294 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Education, 9 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 6 papers in Media Technology. Recurrent topics in H. David Smith's work include Biomedical and Engineering Education (9 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (7 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (6 papers). H. David Smith is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical and Engineering Education (9 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (7 papers) and Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (6 papers). H. David Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Philippines. H. David Smith's co-authors include Penny Hirsch, Buğrahan Yalvaç, John B. Troy, Su Swarat, Greg Light, Denise Drane, Ann McKenna, Gülnur Bírol, Joan A. W. Linsenmeier and Joan Walker and has published in prestigious journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Journal of Engineering Education and Body Image.

In The Last Decade

H. David Smith

17 papers receiving 263 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
H. David Smith United States	9	157	123	59	50	44	18	294
David Reeping United States	9	112 0.7×	93 0.8×	40 0.7×	46 0.9×	33 0.8×	62	293
Nathan Choe United States	11	127 0.8×	69 0.6×	33 0.6×	22 0.4×	17 0.4×	21	268
Jennifer Kersten United States	4	292 1.9×	90 0.7×	44 0.7×	55 1.1×	112 2.5×	7	448
William A. Poppen United States	6	83 0.5×	74 0.6×	23 0.4×	31 0.6×	33 0.8×	31	305
Elizabeth Parry United States	10	87 0.6×	64 0.5×	14 0.2×	46 0.9×	29 0.7×	39	308
Nathan McNeill United States	7	188 1.2×	128 1.0×	30 0.5×	19 0.4×	59 1.3×	19	297
Robert Blanc United States	6	302 1.9×	30 0.2×	12 0.2×	14 0.3×	64 1.5×	11	373
Janet Callahan United States	8	312 2.0×	99 0.8×	26 0.4×	59 1.2×	94 2.1×	54	455
Heidi Loshbaugh United States	9	132 0.8×	135 1.1×	23 0.4×	62 1.2×	14 0.3×	19	297
Anita Patrick United States	10	110 0.7×	107 0.9×	42 0.7×	20 0.4×	27 0.6×	19	270

Countries citing papers authored by H. David Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. David Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. David Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. David Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. David Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. David Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. David Smith. The network helps show where H. David Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. David Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. David Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. David Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. David Smith. H. David Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Smith, H. David, et al.. (2020). Inquiry Based Laboratory Instruction Throws Out The "Cookbook" And Improves Learning. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 8.712.1–8.712.12. 5 indexed citations

Anderson, John, et al.. (2020). Establishing School Wide Standards For Engineering Writing: A Data Driven Approach. 10.585.1–10.585.20. 4 indexed citations

Harrison, Neil, et al.. (2019). Mature female learners activating agency after completion of an education foundation degree: professional progression and the teacher shortage crisis. Research Papers in Education. 36(2). 196–215. 4 indexed citations

Halliwell, Emma, Zali Yager, Nicole Paraskeva, et al.. (2016). Body Image in Primary Schools: A pilot evaluation of a primary school intervention program designed by teachers to improve children’s body satisfaction. Body Image. 19. 133–141. 20 indexed citations

Cassell, Jackie, Julie Dodds, Claudia Estcourt, et al.. (2015). The relative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three contrasting approaches to partner notification for curable sexually transmitted infections: a cluster randomised trial in primary care. Health Technology Assessment. 19(5). 1–116. 20 indexed citations

Smith, H. David, et al.. (2014). Predicting Student Success in a Psychological Statistics Course Emphasizing Collaborative Learning. Teaching of Psychology. 42(1). 56–59. 16 indexed citations

Dumas, Helene M., et al.. (2013). Cardiorespiratory Response During Physical Therapist Intervention for Infants and Young Children With Chronic Respiratory Insufficiency. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 25(2). 178–185. 1 indexed citations

Linsenmeier, Robert A., et al.. (2008). Evaluation of a Challenge‐based Human Metabolism Laboratory for Undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education. 97(2). 213–222. 17 indexed citations

Bírol, Gülnur, Ann McKenna, H. David Smith, Todd D. Giorgio, & Sean Brophy. (2007). Development of challenge based educational modules in the biotechnology domain. 23(1). 171–183. 3 indexed citations

10.

Smith, H. David. (2007). The self- regenerating engineering design course: a top-down approach. International journal of engineering education. 23(1). 141–149. 4 indexed citations

11.

Yalvaç, Buğrahan, H. David Smith, John B. Troy, & Penny Hirsch. (2007). Promoting Advanced Writing Skills in an Upper‐Level Engineering Class. Journal of Engineering Education. 96(2). 117–128. 83 indexed citations

12.

Bírol, Gülnur, Shu Q. Liu, H. David Smith, & Penny Hirsch. (2006). Educational Modules in Tissue Engineering Based on the “How People Learn” Framework. Bioscience Education. 7(1). 1–13. 8 indexed citations

13.

Yalvaç, Buğrahan, et al.. (2006). Teaching writing in a laboratory‐based engineering course with a “How People Learn” framework. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 2006(108). 59–73. 8 indexed citations

14.

Hirsch, Penny, Joan A. W. Linsenmeier, H. David Smith, & Joan Walker. (2005). Enhancing Core Competency Learning in an Integrated Summer Research Experience for Bioengineers. Journal of Engineering Education. 94(4). 391–401. 20 indexed citations

15.

Drane, Denise, et al.. (2005). The Gateway Science Workshop Program: Enhancing Student Performance and Retention in the Sciences Through Peer-Facilitated Discussion. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 14(3). 337–352. 43 indexed citations

16.

Swarat, Su, Denise Drane, H. David Smith, Greg Light, & Lawrence H. Pinto. (2004). Opening the Gateway: Increasing Minority Student Retention in Introductory Science Courses.. The journal of college science teaching. 34(1). 18–23. 21 indexed citations

17.

Bírol, Gülnur, Ann McKenna, H. David Smith, Todd D. Giorgio, & Sean Brophy. (2002). Integration of the "How people learn" framework into educational module development and implementation in biotechnology. 2640–2641 vol.3. 10 indexed citations

18.

Giorgio, Todd D., Sean Brophy, Gülnur Bírol, Ann McKenna, & H. David Smith. (2002). Assessment of educational modules based on the "How people learn" framework delivered to biotechnology learners at two universities. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact