Garnett S. Stokes

1.2k total citations
22 papers, 813 citations indexed

About

Garnett S. Stokes is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Garnett S. Stokes has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 813 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Social Psychology, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Garnett S. Stokes's work include Career Development and Diversity (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). Garnett S. Stokes is often cited by papers focused on Career Development and Diversity (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). Garnett S. Stokes collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Hong Kong. Garnett S. Stokes's co-authors include Christine M. Riordan, Ann K. Buchholtz, Robert D. Gatewood, Michael D. Mumford, Mary Russo, Stephanie M. Green, Benjamin B. Lahey, Keith McBurnett, Rolf Loeber and Mary Anne G. Christ and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Business Venturing and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Garnett S. Stokes

19 papers receiving 723 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Garnett S. Stokes United States 11 259 218 204 159 107 22 813
Reece Akhtar United Kingdom 10 235 0.9× 207 0.9× 248 1.2× 191 1.2× 110 1.0× 14 703
Ronda M. Smith United States 6 238 0.9× 420 1.9× 419 2.1× 220 1.4× 120 1.1× 9 978
Luí­s Curral Portugal 16 151 0.6× 343 1.6× 428 2.1× 118 0.7× 107 1.0× 33 968
Pilar Ripoll Spain 16 158 0.6× 555 2.5× 248 1.2× 145 0.9× 173 1.6× 31 931
Kulraj Singh United States 7 77 0.3× 191 0.9× 250 1.2× 103 0.6× 180 1.7× 9 756
Donna E. Thompson United States 13 58 0.2× 225 1.0× 474 2.3× 71 0.4× 436 4.1× 22 1.2k
Forest J. Jourden United States 8 37 0.1× 415 1.9× 201 1.0× 113 0.7× 190 1.8× 12 1.0k
Christine H. Mooney United States 12 43 0.2× 443 2.0× 191 0.9× 249 1.6× 119 1.1× 20 812
Sarah Dawkins Australia 16 59 0.2× 411 1.9× 447 2.2× 191 1.2× 198 1.9× 36 1.2k
Paola Spagnoli Italy 19 89 0.3× 444 2.0× 349 1.7× 227 1.4× 290 2.7× 48 953

Countries citing papers authored by Garnett S. Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Garnett S. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Garnett S. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Garnett S. Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Garnett S. Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Garnett S. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Garnett S. Stokes. The network helps show where Garnett S. Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Garnett S. Stokes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Garnett S. Stokes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Garnett S. Stokes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Garnett S. Stokes. Garnett S. Stokes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stokes, Garnett S., et al.. (2004). Cross-cultural validation of Holland’s interest structure in chinese population. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 67(3). 379–396. 30 indexed citations
2.
Buchholtz, Ann K., et al.. (2003). The Big Five and venture survival: Is there a linkage?. Journal of Business Venturing. 19(4). 465–483. 323 indexed citations
3.
Stokes, Garnett S., et al.. (2002). The Meaning, Development, and Career Outcomes of Breadth of Vocational Interests. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 61(2). 327–347. 17 indexed citations
4.
Stokes, Garnett S. & Lisa A. Cooper. (2001). Content/Construct Approaches in Life History Form Development for Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 9(1-2). 138–151. 8 indexed citations
5.
Stokes, Garnett S.. (1999). Introduction to Special Issue: The Next One Hundred Years of Biodata. Human Resource Management Review. 9(2). 111–116. 16 indexed citations
6.
Stokes, Garnett S. & Cynthia A. Searcy. (1999). Specification of Scales in Biodata Form Development: Rational vs. Empirical and Global vs. Specific. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 7(2). 72–85. 14 indexed citations
7.
Stokes, Garnett S., et al.. (1999). Construct/Rational Biodata Dimensions to Predict Salesperson Performance: Report on the U.S. Department of Labor Sales Study. Human Resource Management Review. 9(2). 185–218. 11 indexed citations
8.
Johnson, C. Douglas & Garnett S. Stokes. (1999). UNDERSTANDING THE MEANING, DEVELOPMENT, AND CAREER OUTCOMES OF BREADTH OF VOCATIONAL (BVI) INTERESTS:A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK AND LONGITUDINAL INVESTIGATION.. Academy of Management Proceedings. 1999(1). B1–B6.
9.
Stokes, Garnett S. & Graham Parkhurst. (1995). Change through interchange: Making complex journeys easier. Final report to Rees Jeffreys road fund. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol). 1 indexed citations
10.
Iezzi, Anthony, et al.. (1994). Somatothymia in Chronic Pain Patients. Psychosomatics. 35(5). 460–468. 6 indexed citations
11.
Snell, Andrea F., et al.. (1994). Adolescent life experiences as predictors of occupational attainment.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79(1). 131–141. 9 indexed citations
12.
Stokes, Garnett S. & Lisa A. Cooper. (1994). Selection using biodata: Old notions revisited.. 8 indexed citations
13.
Snell, Andrea F., et al.. (1994). Adolescent life experiences as predictors of occupational attainment.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 79(1). 131–141.
14.
Russo, Mary, Garnett S. Stokes, Benjamin B. Lahey, et al.. (1993). A sensation seeking scale for children: Further refinement and psychometric development. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 15(2). 69–86. 173 indexed citations
15.
Stokes, Garnett S., et al.. (1993). COMPARABILITY OF INCUMBENT AND APPLICANT SAMPLES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BIODATA KEYS: THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY. Personnel Psychology. 46(4). 739–762. 37 indexed citations
16.
Iezzi, Anthony, et al.. (1992). An identification of low back pain groups using biobehavioral variables. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2(1). 19–33. 7 indexed citations
17.
Mumford, Michael D. & Garnett S. Stokes. (1992). Developmental determinants of individual action: Theory and practice in applying background measures.. 39 indexed citations
18.
Iezzi, Anthony, et al.. (1991). Facial expressions of pain in muscle-contraction headache patients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 13(3). 269–283. 2 indexed citations
19.
Stokes, Garnett S., et al.. (1989). Performance and Satisfaction in Private versus Nonprivate Work Settings. Environment and Behavior. 21(3). 277–297. 85 indexed citations
20.
Stokes, Garnett S., Michael D. Mumford, & William A. Owens. (1989). Life History Prototypes in the Study of Human Individuality. Journal of Personality. 57(2). 509–545. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026