Garnett S. Stokes

19 papers receiving 723 citations

Peers

Garnett S. Stokes
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 259
  • Social Psychology 218
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 204
  • Clinical Psychology 159
  • Sociology and Political Science 107
Replace Reece Akhtar with:
Reece Akhtar United Kingdom
Ronda M. Smith United States
Pilar Ripoll Spain
Luí­s Curral Portugal
Kulraj Singh United States
Paola Spagnoli Italy
Christine H. Mooney United States
Rachel Morrison New Zealand
Jessica L. Ford United States
Emma Martín United Kingdom
Garnett S. Stokes relative to Reece Akhtar United Kingdom Reece Akhtar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Reece Akhtar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Garnett S. Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Garnett S. Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Garnett S. Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Garnett S. Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Garnett S. Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Garnett S. Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Garnett S. Stokes. The network helps show where Garnett S. Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Garnett S. Stokes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Garnett S. Stokes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Garnett S. Stokes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Garnett S. Stokes. Garnett S. Stokes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 30
2 323
3 17
4 16
5 14
6 0
7 11
8
Change through interchange: Making complex journeys easier. Final report to Rees Jeffreys road fund
1
9 6
10 9
11
Selection using biodata: Old notions revisited.
8
12 0
13 173
14 37
15 7
16
Developmental determinants of individual action: Theory and practice in applying background measures.
39
17 2
18 85
19 19
20 8

About Garnett S. Stokes

Garnett S. Stokes is a scholar working on Safety Research, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 22 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Career Development and Diversity (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (259 citations), Business and International Management (43 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (204 citations). Garnett S. Stokes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Gatewood, Ann K. Buchholtz, Christine M. Riordan, Michael D. Mumford, Stephanie M. Green, Benjamin B. Lahey, Mary Russo, Mary Anne G. Christ, Rolf Loeber and Magda Stouthamer‐Loeber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Business Venturing and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026