Daniel R. Eignor

8.3k total citations
54 papers, 832 citations indexed

About

Daniel R. Eignor is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Networks and Communications and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel R. Eignor has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 832 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 18 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 9 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Daniel R. Eignor's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (30 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (18 papers) and Educational Technology and Assessment (5 papers). Daniel R. Eignor is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (30 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (18 papers) and Educational Technology and Assessment (5 papers). Daniel R. Eignor collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Daniel R. Eignor's co-authors include Linda L. Cook, Carol Taylor, Joan Jamieson, Irwin S. Kirsch, Ronald K. Hambleton, Neil J. Dorans, Martha L. Stocking, Hariharan Swaminathan, Janice A. Gifford and Alicia P. Schmitt and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Educational Research, TESOL Quarterly and Language Learning.

In The Last Decade

Daniel R. Eignor

53 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel R. Eignor United States 17 423 249 245 142 116 54 832
William H. Angoff United States 18 456 1.1× 165 0.7× 290 1.2× 182 1.3× 171 1.5× 53 1.1k
Kentaro Yamamoto United States 17 294 0.7× 151 0.6× 323 1.3× 115 0.8× 137 1.2× 44 924
Hong Jiao United States 16 327 0.8× 136 0.5× 231 0.9× 150 1.1× 159 1.4× 48 850
G. Gage Kingsbury United States 11 362 0.9× 147 0.6× 224 0.9× 112 0.8× 85 0.7× 30 879
John R. Donoghue United States 14 529 1.3× 283 1.1× 129 0.5× 85 0.6× 207 1.8× 50 994
H. Jane Rogers United States 11 871 2.1× 471 1.9× 259 1.1× 241 1.7× 262 2.3× 20 1.4k
Michael L. Nering United States 12 409 1.0× 215 0.9× 115 0.5× 99 0.7× 138 1.2× 18 901
H. D. Hoover United States 9 313 0.7× 173 0.7× 294 1.2× 142 1.0× 130 1.1× 32 689
Carol M. Myford United States 16 356 0.8× 49 0.2× 416 1.7× 164 1.2× 60 0.5× 41 1.1k
Ronald J. Nungester United States 14 220 0.5× 94 0.4× 145 0.6× 127 0.9× 49 0.4× 23 616

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel R. Eignor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel R. Eignor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel R. Eignor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel R. Eignor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel R. Eignor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel R. Eignor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel R. Eignor. The network helps show where Daniel R. Eignor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel R. Eignor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel R. Eignor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel R. Eignor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel R. Eignor. Daniel R. Eignor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cook, Linda L., Daniel R. Eignor, Jonathan Steinberg, Yasuyo Sawaki, & Frederick Cline. (2014). Using Factor Analysis to Investigate the Impact of Accommodations on the Scores of Students with Disabilities on a Reading Comprehension Assessment.. 10(2). 1–33. 7 indexed citations
2.
Dorans, Neil J., Tim Moses, & Daniel R. Eignor. (2010). Principles and Practices of Test Score Equating. Research Report. ETS RR-10-29.. 3 indexed citations
3.
Eignor, Daniel R.. (2008). NCME 2007 Presidential Address: The Concordance Table: An Invitation to Misuse Test Scores. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 27(4). 30–33. 1 indexed citations
4.
Robin, Frédéric, et al.. (2005). A Comparison of Two Procedures for Constrained Adaptive Test Construction. Research Report. ETS RR-04-39.. ETS Research Report Series. 1 indexed citations
5.
Taylor, Carol, Irwin S. Kirsch, Joan Jamieson, & Daniel R. Eignor. (1999). Examining the Relationship Between Computer Familiarity and Performance on Computer‐Based Language Tasks. Language Learning. 49(2). 219–274. 65 indexed citations
6.
Eignor, Daniel R.. (1997). Guidelines for Computerized-Adaptive Test Development and Use in Education [Book Review].. Journal of Educational Measurement. 34(1). 97–100. 1 indexed citations
7.
Eignor, Daniel R., et al.. (1993). CASE STUDIES IN COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST DESIGN THROUGH SIMULATION1,2. ETS Research Report Series. 1993(2). 30 indexed citations
8.
Cook, Linda L. & Daniel R. Eignor. (1991). NCME Instructional Module: IRT Equating Methods.. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice. 10(3). 37–45. 13 indexed citations
9.
Cook, Linda L., Daniel R. Eignor, & Alicia P. Schmitt. (1990). EQUATING ACHIEVEMENT TESTS USING SAMPLES MATCHED ON ABILITY. ETS Research Report Series. 1990(1). 10 indexed citations
10.
Cook, Linda L., et al.. (1990). ALIGNING SCORE SCALES FOR ACHIEVEMENT TESTS IN MULTIPLE CONTENT AREAS1,2. ETS Research Report Series. 1990(2). 1 indexed citations
11.
Cook, Linda L. & Daniel R. Eignor. (1989). Using item response theory in test score equating. International Journal of Educational Research. 13(2). 161–173. 14 indexed citations
12.
Cook, Linda L., Daniel R. Eignor, & Alicia P. Schmitt. (1988). THE EFFECTS ON IRT AND CONVENTIONAL ACHIEVEMENT TEST EQUATING RESULTS OF USING EQUATING SAMPLES MATCHED ON ABILITY1,2. ETS Research Report Series. 1988(2). 10 indexed citations
13.
Cook, Linda L., Neil J. Dorans, & Daniel R. Eignor. (1988). An Assessment of the Dimensionality of Three SAT-Verbal Test Editions. Journal of Educational Statistics. 13(1). 19–19. 15 indexed citations
14.
Wingersky, Marilyn S., Linda L. Cook, & Daniel R. Eignor. (1987). SPECIFYING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF LINKING ITEMS USED FOR ITEM RESPONSE THEORY ITEM CALIBRATION1,2. ETS Research Report Series. 1987(1). 22 indexed citations
15.
Eignor, Daniel R., et al.. (1986). APPLICATION OF A NEW GOODNESS‐OF‐FIT PLOT PROCEDURE TO SAT AND TOEFL ITEM TYPE DATA1,2,3. ETS Research Report Series. 1986(2). 2 indexed citations
16.
Eignor, Daniel R. & Martha L. Stocking. (1986). AN INVESTIGATION OF POSSIBLE CAUSES FOR THE INADEQUACY OF IRT PRE‐EQUATING1,2,3. ETS Research Report Series. 1986(1). 4 indexed citations
17.
Cook, Linda L. & Daniel R. Eignor. (1985). AN INVESTIGATION OF THE FEASIBILITY OF APPLYING ITEM RESPONSE THEORY TO EQUATE ACHIEVEMENT TESTS1,2,3. ETS Research Report Series. 1985(2). 10 indexed citations
18.
Eignor, Daniel R. & Linda L. Cook. (1983). An Investigation of the Feasibility of Using Item Response Theory in the Pre-Equating of Aptitude Tests.. 12 indexed citations
19.
Eignor, Daniel R. & Ronald K. Hambleton. (1979). Effects of Test Length and Advancement Score on Several Criterion-Referenced Test Reliability and Validity Indices. Laboratory of Psychometric and Evaluation Research Report No. 86.. 2 indexed citations
20.
Hambleton, Ronald K. & Daniel R. Eignor. (1978). Guidelines for Evaluating Criterion-Referenced Tests and Test Manuals.. Journal of Educational Measurement. 15(4). 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026