Amanda Crowell
Impact in
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Education top 2%
- Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Science Education and Pedagogy
- Writing and Handwriting Education
Papers in
- Education 10
- Education and Critical Thinking Development 8
- Writing and Handwriting Education 1
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 7
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 6
- Co-authors
- Deanna Kuhn (5 shared papers)Nicole Zillmer (1 shared paper)Christian D. Schunn (3 shared papers)Mark Felton (2 shared papers)Tina Liu (1 shared paper)Meghan Bathgate (1 shared paper)Rena Dorph (1 shared paper)Marion Goldstein (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Cognition and Development (1 paper)Research in Science Education (1 paper)Cognition and Instruction (1 paper)Psychological Science (1 paper)Informal Logic (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Amanda Crowell
12 papers receiving 755 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 506
- Education 571
- Computer Science Applications 32
- Literature and Literary Theory 63
- Language and Linguistics 56
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Crowell
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Crowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Crowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Crowell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Crowell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Crowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Crowell. The network helps show where Amanda Crowell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Crowell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 243 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 166 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 117 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 84 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 11 | Argumentation as a Path to the Thinking Development of Young Adolescents. | 2011 | 3 |
| 12 | 2011 | 3 |
About Amanda Crowell
Amanda Crowell is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Social Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 820 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education and Critical Thinking Development (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (6 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (1 paper), Writing and Handwriting Education (1 paper) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (506 citations), Education (571 citations), Computer Science Applications (32 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (63 citations) and Language and Linguistics (56 citations). Amanda Crowell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Deanna Kuhn, Nicole Zillmer, Christian D. Schunn, Mark Felton, Tina Liu, Meghan Bathgate, Rena Dorph, Marion Goldstein, Mercè García-Milà and Gloria M. Miele. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cognition and Development, Research in Science Education, Cognition and Instruction, Psychological Science and Informal Logic.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.