Amanda Crowell

1.1k total citations
12 papers, 807 citations indexed

About

Amanda Crowell is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Crowell has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 807 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Education, 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Amanda Crowell's work include Education and Critical Thinking Development (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (6 papers). Amanda Crowell is often cited by papers focused on Education and Critical Thinking Development (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (6 papers). Amanda Crowell collaborates with scholars based in United States. Amanda Crowell's co-authors include Deanna Kuhn, Nicole Zillmer, Christian D. Schunn, Mark Felton, Tina Liu, Meghan Bathgate, Rena Dorph, Mercè García-Milà, Eva Turrigiano and Aimee Campbell and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, International Journal of Science Education and Cognition and Instruction.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Crowell

12 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amanda Crowell United States	10	570	503	90	63	55	12	807
Patricia Donahue Canada	12	526 0.9×	385 0.8×	77 0.9×	72 1.1×	38 0.7×	23	740
Miika Marttunen Finland	17	521 0.9×	498 1.0×	109 1.2×	94 1.5×	30 0.5×	46	752
Jean Schmittau United States	7	457 0.8×	296 0.6×	63 0.7×	59 0.9×	62 1.1×	11	732
Mary C. Daane	6	743 1.3×	619 1.2×	71 0.8×	132 2.1×	97 1.8×	7	988
Carlo Magno Philippines	12	478 0.8×	302 0.6×	42 0.5×	51 0.8×	78 1.4×	61	771
Hartmut Giest Germany	4	315 0.6×	238 0.5×	70 0.8×	56 0.9×	60 1.1×	26	571
Nadine Spörer Germany	16	514 0.9×	404 0.8×	118 1.3×	24 0.4×	59 1.1×	42	772
Joseph Dimino United States	17	700 1.2×	714 1.4×	58 0.6×	37 0.6×	54 1.0×	41	1.1k
Olga Dysthe Norway	13	683 1.2×	222 0.4×	46 0.5×	112 1.8×	77 1.4×	27	873
Carolyn P. Panofsky United States	5	331 0.6×	282 0.6×	67 0.7×	87 1.4×	80 1.5×	5	628

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Crowell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Crowell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Crowell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Crowell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Crowell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Crowell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Crowell. The network helps show where Amanda Crowell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Crowell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Crowell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Crowell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Crowell. Amanda Crowell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

Felton, Mark, et al.. (2019). Capturing deliberative argument: An analytic coding scheme for studying argumentative dialogue and its benefits for learning. Learning Culture and Social Interaction. 36. 100350–100350. 26 indexed citations

Felton, Mark, Amanda Crowell, & Tina Liu. (2015). Arguing to Agree. Written Communication. 32(3). 317–331. 54 indexed citations

Bathgate, Meghan, et al.. (2015). The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education. 37(10). 1590–1612. 84 indexed citations

Crowell, Amanda & Christian D. Schunn. (2015). Unpacking the Relationship Between Science Education and Applied Scientific Literacy. Research in Science Education. 46(1). 129–140. 33 indexed citations

Kuhn, Deanna, et al.. (2013). Developing Norms of Argumentation: Metacognitive, Epistemological, and Social Dimensions of Developing Argumentive Competence. Cognition and Instruction. 31(4). 456–496. 163 indexed citations

Crowell, Amanda & Christian D. Schunn. (2013). Scientifically literate action: Key barriers and facilitators across context and content. Public Understanding of Science. 23(6). 718–733. 11 indexed citations

Crowell, Amanda & Deanna Kuhn. (2012). Developing Dialogic Argumentation Skills: A 3-year Intervention Study. Journal of Cognition and Development. 15(2). 363–381. 117 indexed citations

Kuhn, Deanna & Amanda Crowell. (2011). Argumentation as a Path to the Thinking Development of Young Adolescents.. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. 3 indexed citations

Kuhn, Deanna & Amanda Crowell. (2011). Dialogic Argumentation as a Vehicle for Developing Young Adolescents’ Thinking. Psychological Science. 22(4). 545–552. 236 indexed citations

10.

Campbell, Aimee, Edward V. Nunes, Gloria M. Miele, et al.. (2011). Design and methodological considerations of an effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention: An example from the NIDA Clinical Trials Network. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 33(2). 386–395. 48 indexed citations

11.

Crowell, Amanda. (2011). Assessment of a Three-Year Argument Skill Development Curriculum. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 3 indexed citations

12.

Crowell, Amanda, et al.. (2009). What Constitutes Skilled Argumentation and How Does it Develop?. Informal Logic. 29(4). 379–379. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact