Nicole C. Krämer

12.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
219 papers, 6.8k citations indexed

About

Nicole C. Krämer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicole C. Krämer has authored 219 papers receiving a total of 6.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 107 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 72 papers in Social Psychology and 48 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Nicole C. Krämer's work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (43 papers), Social Media and Politics (40 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (33 papers). Nicole C. Krämer is often cited by papers focused on Social Robot Interaction and HRI (43 papers), Social Media and Politics (40 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (33 papers). Nicole C. Krämer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Nicole C. Krämer's co-authors include Stephan Winter, German Neubaum, Astrid Rosenthal-von der Pütten, Nina Haferkamp, Sabrina C. Eimler, Leonie Rösner, Gary Bente, Jonathan Gratch, Laura Hoffmann and Sabrina Sobieraj and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Nicole C. Krämer

207 papers receiving 6.5k citations

Hit Papers

Impression Management 2.0 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 2017 100 200 300 400 500

Peers

Nicole C. Krämer
Jesse Fox United States
Sherry Turkle United States
S. Shyam Sundar United States
David Stillwell United Kingdom
Adam Joinson United Kingdom
Byron Reeves United States
Nick Yee United States
Seung‐A Annie Jin United States
Geri Gay United States
Jesse Fox United States
Nicole C. Krämer
Citations per year, relative to Nicole C. Krämer Nicole C. Krämer (= 1×) peers Jesse Fox

Countries citing papers authored by Nicole C. Krämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicole C. Krämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicole C. Krämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicole C. Krämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicole C. Krämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicole C. Krämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicole C. Krämer. The network helps show where Nicole C. Krämer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicole C. Krämer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicole C. Krämer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicole C. Krämer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicole C. Krämer. Nicole C. Krämer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lodde, Georg, et al.. (2025). Psychological Factors Influencing Appropriate Reliance on AI-enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Experimental Web-Based Study Among Dermatologists. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 27. e58660–e58660. 3 indexed citations
2.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2024). Psychological Traits and Appropriate Reliance: Factors Shaping Trust in AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 1–17. 20 indexed citations
3.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2024). Differences in access to privacy information can partly explain digital inequalities in privacy literacy and self-efficacy. Behaviour and Information Technology. 44(6). 1183–1198. 4 indexed citations
4.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2024). Does Polarizing News Become Less Polarizing When Written by an AI?. Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications. 37(6). 388–399. 1 indexed citations
5.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2024). In Seal We Trust? Investigating the Effect of Certifications on Perceived Trustworthiness of AI Systems. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8. 141–162. 2 indexed citations
6.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2023). Is Personality Key? Persuasive Effects of Prior Attitudes and Personality in Political Microtargeting. Media and Communication. 11(3). 250–261. 7 indexed citations
7.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2023). Spot the bot: Investigating user's detection cues for social bots and their willingness to verify Twitter profiles. Computers in Human Behavior. 146. 107819–107819. 4 indexed citations
8.
Flanagin, Andrew J., et al.. (2022). Social Sharing of Political Disinformation: Effects of Tie Strength, Message Valence, and Corrective Information on Evaluations of Political Figures. Western Journal of Communication. 87(2). 173–195. 5 indexed citations
9.
Szczuka, Jessica M., et al.. (2022). How do children acquire knowledge about voice assistants? A longitudinal field study on children’s knowledge about how voice assistants store and process data. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction. 33. 100460–100460. 17 indexed citations
10.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2021). Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis. Studies in Communication and Media. 10(3). I–II. 1 indexed citations
11.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2021). The Strength of Weak Ties Revisited: Further Evidence of the Role of Strong Ties in the Provision of Online Social Support. Social Media + Society. 7(2). 44 indexed citations
12.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2021). Investigating factors that affect the adoption of COVID-19 contact-tracing apps: A privacy calculus perspective.. DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen). 2(3). 224–233. 9 indexed citations
13.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2020). When is Disinformation (In)Credible? Experimental Findings on Message Characteristics and Individual Differences. Mass Communication & Society. 23(4). 484–509. 53 indexed citations
14.
Reer, Felix & Nicole C. Krämer. (2020). Investigating psychological causes and consequences of playing in online gaming communities: The roles of offline and clan-based need satisfaction. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds. 12(2). 201–212. 6 indexed citations
15.
Winter, Stephan, et al.. (2020). The Influence of privacy control options on the evaluation and user acceptance of mobile applications for volunteers in crisis situations. Behaviour and Information Technology. 40(8). 759–775. 3 indexed citations
16.
Pütten, Astrid Rosenthal-von der, Nicole C. Krämer, Stefan Maderwald, Matthias Brand, & Fabian Grabenhorst. (2019). Neural Mechanisms for Accepting and Rejecting Artificial Social Partners in the Uncanny Valley. Journal of Neuroscience. 39(33). 6555–6570. 45 indexed citations
17.
Pütten, Astrid Rosenthal-von der, Carolin Straßmann, Ramin Yaghoubzadeh, Stefan Kopp, & Nicole C. Krämer. (2018). Dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior of virtual agents and its effects on evaluation and negotiation outcome in different age groups. Computers in Human Behavior. 90. 397–409. 28 indexed citations
18.
Pütten, Astrid Rosenthal-von der & Nicole C. Krämer. (2015). Individuals’ Evaluations of and Attitudes Towards Potentially Uncanny Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. 7(5). 799–824. 36 indexed citations
19.
Pütten, Astrid Rosenthal-von der, Frank P. Schulte, Sabrina C. Eimler, et al.. (2013). Neural correlates of empathy towards robots. 215–216. 19 indexed citations
20.
Krämer, Nicole C., et al.. (2009). Lieschen Müller wird politisch. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag eBooks. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026