Eugene F. Stone

41 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Job Satisfaction: How People Feel about Their Jobs and Ho...19942026200420151994250500750

Peers

Eugene F. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.4k
  • Sociology and Political Science 881
  • Social Psychology 775
  • General Health Professions 352
  • Information Systems and Management 323
Replace Robert S. Billings with:
Robert S. Billings United States
Allan P. Jones United States
Ramon J. Aldag United States
Stephen A. Stumpf United States
Steven P. Brown United States
Robert D. Pritchard United States
James R. Terborg United States
George W. England United States
James C. McElroy United States
John M. Ivancevich United States
Eugene F. Stone relative to Robert S. Billings United States Robert S. Billings's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Robert S. Billings · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eugene F. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene F. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene F. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene F. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene F. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene F. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene F. Stone. The network helps show where Eugene F. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eugene F. Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eugene F. Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eugene F. Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eugene F. Stone. Eugene F. Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 29
2 490
3 32
4 1
5 51
6 36
7 18
8 2
9 9
10 3
11 14
12 22
13 26
14 21
15 40
16 12
17
The Exercise of Influence in Educational Organizations.
1
18 71
19
Job Scope, Job Satisfaction, and the Protestant Ethic: A Study of Enlisted Men in the U. S. Navy. Technical Report No. 27.
2
20
Job Scope and Job Satisfaction: A Study of Urban Workers.
3

About Eugene F. Stone

Eugene F. Stone is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Social Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Human Behavior and Motivation (6 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.4k citations), Applied Psychology (251 citations) and Information Systems and Management (323 citations). Eugene F. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John R. Hollenbeck, Patricia C. Smith, Timothy A. Judge, C. J. Cranny, Hal G. Gueutal, Lyman W. Porter, Stephen L. McClure, Donald G. Gardner, Dianna L. Stone and Richard T. Mowday. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology and Administrative Science Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026