Edward W. Miles

3.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
51 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Edward W. Miles is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Edward W. Miles has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 20 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 13 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Edward W. Miles's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (15 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (14 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (10 papers). Edward W. Miles is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (15 papers), Conflict Management and Negotiation (14 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (10 papers). Edward W. Miles collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Edward W. Miles's co-authors include Richard C. Huseman, John D. Hatfield, Wesley C. King, Bruce W. Eagle, Marjorie L. Icenogle, Steven L. Grover, William H. Bommer, Megan Ferguson, Julie Brimblecombe and Todd J. Maurer and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Review, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Management.

In The Last Decade

Edward W. Miles

46 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

A New Perspective on Equity Theory: The Equity Sensitivit... 1987 2026 2000 2013 1987 100 200 300 400 500

Peers

Edward W. Miles
Dirk D. Steiner United States
David M. Sluss United States
Nikos Bozionelos United Kingdom
Steven L. Grover New Zealand
Loriann Roberson United States
Cheryl L. Adkins United States
Marian N. Ruderman United States
David M. Long United States
Dirk D. Steiner United States
Edward W. Miles
Citations per year, relative to Edward W. Miles Edward W. Miles (= 1×) peers Dirk D. Steiner

Countries citing papers authored by Edward W. Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward W. Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward W. Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward W. Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward W. Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward W. Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward W. Miles. The network helps show where Edward W. Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward W. Miles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward W. Miles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward W. Miles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward W. Miles. Edward W. Miles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ferguson, Megan, Emma Tonkin, Julie Brimblecombe, et al.. (2023). Communities Setting the Direction for Their Right to Nutritious, Affordable Food: Co-Design of the Remote Food Security Project in Australian Indigenous Communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 20(4). 2936–2936. 6 indexed citations
2.
Brimblecombe, Julie, Megan Ferguson, Catherine L. Mah, et al.. (2023). Implementation of a food retail intervention to reduce purchase of unhealthy food and beverages in remote Australia: mixed-method evaluation using the consolidated framework for implementation research. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 20(1). 20–20. 8 indexed citations
3.
Brimblecombe, Julie, Emma McMahon, Megan Ferguson, et al.. (2020). Effect of restricted retail merchandising of discretionary food and beverages on population diet: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Planetary Health. 4(10). e463–e473. 42 indexed citations
4.
Miles, Edward W., et al.. (2020). How face threat sensitivity affects proactive negotiation behavior. Organization Management Journal. 17(1). 2–14.
5.
Brimblecombe, Julie, Megan Ferguson, Emma McMahon, et al.. (2019). Reducing Retail Merchandising of Discretionary Food and Beverages in Remote Indigenous Community Stores: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols. 8(3). e12646–e12646. 11 indexed citations
6.
Miles, Edward W.. (2019). The Purpose of the Business School. 3 indexed citations
7.
Brimblecombe, Julie, Megan Ferguson, Mark D. Chatfield, et al.. (2017). Effect of a price discount and consumer education strategy on food and beverage purchases in remote Indigenous Australia: a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Public Health. 2(2). e82–e95. 76 indexed citations
8.
Miles, Edward W., et al.. (2017). A proposed model for effective negotiation skill development. Journal of Management Development. 36(7). 940–958. 26 indexed citations
9.
Ferguson, Megan, et al.. (2017). Traditional food availability and consumption in remote Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory, Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 41(3). 294–298. 54 indexed citations
10.
Ferguson, Megan, et al.. (2016). Food and beverage price discounts to improve health in remote Aboriginal communities: mixed method evaluation of a natural experiment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 41(1). 32–37. 34 indexed citations
12.
Miles, Edward W. & Todd J. Maurer. (2010). Advancing validity of self‐efficacy in negotiation through focusing at the domain level. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 85(1). 23–41. 18 indexed citations
13.
Miles, Edward W., et al.. (2010). Cloud medicine. BMJ. c78–c78.
14.
Miles, Edward W.. (2009). Gender differences in distributive negotiation: When in the negotiation process do the differences occur?. European Journal of Social Psychology. 40(7). 1200–1211. 35 indexed citations
15.
Miles, Edward W., et al.. (2008). Asymmetrical contextual ambiguity, negotiation self‐efficacy, and negotiation performance. International Journal of Conflict Management. 19(1). 36–56. 23 indexed citations
16.
Eagle, Bruce W., Edward W. Miles, & Marjorie L. Icenogle. (1997). Interrole Conflicts and the Permeability of Work and Family Domains: Are There Gender Differences?. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 50(2). 168–184. 239 indexed citations
17.
King, Wesley C. & Edward W. Miles. (1995). A quasi-experimental assessment of the effect of computerizing noncognitive paper-and-pencil measurements: A test of measurement equivalence.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 80(6). 643–651. 83 indexed citations
18.
Miles, Edward W., John D. Hatfield, & Richard C. Huseman. (1989). The Equity Sensitivity Construct: Potential Implications for Worker Performance. Journal of Management. 15(4). 581–588. 95 indexed citations
19.
Hatfield, John D., Richard C. Huseman, & Edward W. Miles. (1987). Perceptual Differences In Verbal Recognition and Relative Job Satisfaction. Communication Research Reports. 4(1). 8–13. 1 indexed citations
20.
Huseman, Richard C., John D. Hatfield, & Edward W. Miles. (1987). A New Perspective on Equity Theory: The Equity Sensitivity Construct. Academy of Management Review. 12(2). 222–222. 228 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026