Luke Greenacre

54 total papers · 960 total citations
41 papers, 700 citations indexed

About

Luke Greenacre is a scholar working on Marketing, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Luke Greenacre has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 700 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Marketing, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Luke Greenacre's work include Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (12 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (8 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers). Luke Greenacre is often cited by papers focused on Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (12 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (8 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers). Luke Greenacre collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Luke Greenacre's co-authors include Larry Lockshin, Richard Lee, Rami N. Khushaba, Gamini Dissanayake, Sarath Kodagoda, Jordan J. Louviere, Sandra J. Burke, Rachel Kennedy, Byron Sharp and Sebastian Filep and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Business Research and Expert Systems with Applications.

In The Last Decade

Luke Greenacre

41 papers receiving 652 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Luke Greenacre 234 154 103 92 91 41 700
Alexa K. Fox 223 1.0× 329 2.1× 84 0.8× 77 0.8× 26 0.3× 29 839
Irene Roozen 257 1.1× 159 1.0× 270 2.6× 71 0.8× 31 0.3× 42 803
Rahul Govind 265 1.1× 134 0.9× 145 1.4× 55 0.6× 35 0.4× 32 703
Beverly A. Browne 353 1.5× 166 1.1× 102 1.0× 119 1.3× 28 0.3× 21 848
Mary T. Curren 285 1.2× 209 1.4× 64 0.6× 86 0.9× 49 0.5× 18 643
Neil Granitz 156 0.7× 243 1.6× 173 1.7× 96 1.0× 42 0.5× 19 774
Robert C. Erffmeyer 183 0.8× 200 1.3× 97 0.9× 136 1.5× 72 0.8× 29 824
Kathleen A. Krentler 132 0.6× 184 1.2× 245 2.4× 70 0.8× 26 0.3× 21 664
Wangshuai Wang 221 0.9× 240 1.6× 73 0.7× 268 2.9× 34 0.4× 30 762
Norbert Mundorf 180 0.8× 247 1.6× 42 0.4× 162 1.8× 28 0.3× 35 879

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Greenacre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Greenacre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Greenacre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Greenacre more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Greenacre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Greenacre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Greenacre. The network helps show where Luke Greenacre may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Greenacre

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Greenacre. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Greenacre based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Greenacre. Luke Greenacre is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026