Diane R. Paul
- Physiology top 5%
- Speech and Hearing top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tanya L. EadieRobert E. HillmanJulie Barkmeier‐KraemerShaheen N. AwanDimitar D. DeliyskiRita R. PatelJan G. ŠvecMark S. Courey
- Topics
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers)Language Development and Disorders (6 papers)
- Journals
- American Political Science ReviewDisability and RehabilitationJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCyprus
In The Last Decade
Diane R. Paul
31 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Physiology 741
- Speech and Hearing 433
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 407
- Clinical Psychology 405
- Cognitive Neuroscience 235
Countries citing papers authored by Diane R. Paul
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane R. Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane R. Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane R. Paul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diane R. Paul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane R. Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane R. Paul. The network helps show where Diane R. Paul may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane R. Paul
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane R. Paul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane R. Paul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane R. Paul. Diane R. Paul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Training needs in augmentative and alternative communication: A virtual roundtable discussion | 3 |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 143 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Yes, DSM-5 Changes SLP-Relevant Disorder Categories: What You Need to Know | 2 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 61 | |
| 16 | 93 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | Gestures of Conciliation: Factors Contributing to Successful Olive Branches | 11 |
About Diane R. Paul
Diane R. Paul is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Occupational Therapy and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (7 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (433 citations), Occupational Therapy (200 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (407 citations). Diane R. Paul has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include Tanya L. Eadie, Robert E. Hillman, Julie Barkmeier‐Kraemer, Shaheen N. Awan, Dimitar D. Deliyski, Rita R. Patel, Jan G. Švec, Mark S. Courey, Daryush D. Mehta and M. Preeti Sivasankar. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, Disability and Rehabilitation and Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.