American Political Science Review

7.4k papers and 392.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.4k papers published in American Political Science Review in the last decades have received a total of 392.3k indexed citations. Papers published in American Political Science Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (3.3k papers), Sociology and Political Science (2.0k papers) and Economics and Econometrics (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1.4k papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (435 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (360 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Political Science Review are Charles Noble, Heinz Eulau, James D. Fearon, Paul Pierson, Seymour Martin Lipset, Douglas A. Hibbs, Jack L. Walker, William H. Riker, David D. Laitin and Arend Lijphart.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in American Political Science Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American Political Science Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Political Science Review.

Countries where authors publish in American Political Science Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Political Science Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Political Science Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Political Science Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025