Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Effectiveness of Early Head Start for 3-Year-Old Children and Their Parents: Lessons for Policy and Programs.
2005524 citationsJohn M. Love, Ellen Eliason Kisker et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Diane Paulsell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Paulsell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Paulsell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Paulsell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Paulsell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Paulsell. The network helps show where Diane Paulsell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane Paulsell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane Paulsell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane Paulsell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Diane Paulsell. Diane Paulsell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Grosso, Patricia Del, et al.. (2014). Early Care and Education Partnerships: A Review of the Literature. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.3 indexed citations
2.
Paulsell, Diane, et al.. (2014). Regional Partnership Grant Program Cross-Site Evaluation Design Report. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.1 indexed citations
3.
Paulsell, Diane. (2012). Replicating and Scaling Up Evidence-Based Home Visiting Program: The Role of Implementation Research. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
4.
Avellar, Sarah & Diane Paulsell. (2011). Lessons Learned from the Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.13 indexed citations
5.
Boller, Kimberly, et al.. (2010). The Seeds to Success Modified Field Test: Findings from the Impact and Implementation Studies.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.15 indexed citations
6.
Paulsell, Diane, Sarah Avellar, Emily Martin, & Patricia Del Grosso. (2010). Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness Review: Executive Summary. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.145 indexed citations
7.
Boller, Kimberly, et al.. (2010). The Seeds to Success Modified Field Test Impact Evaluation Findings. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.2 indexed citations
8.
Paulsell, Diane, et al.. (2010). Supporting Quality in HomeBased Child Care Initiative Design and Evaluation Options. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.5 indexed citations
9.
Boller, Kimberly, et al.. (2010). Partnering with Families for Early Learning Home Visit Observations. Better Beginnings.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.1 indexed citations
10.
Paulsell, Diane, et al.. (2010). Assessing Home Visit Quality Dosage, Content, and Relationships. Zero to three. 30(6). 16–21.20 indexed citations
11.
Paulsell, Diane, et al.. (2010). Supporting Quality in Home-Based Child Care. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.2 indexed citations
12.
Paulsell, Diane, et al.. (2010). A Review of the Literature on HomeBased Child Care Implications for Future Directions. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.53 indexed citations
13.
Koball, Heather, Kimberly Boller, Deborah Daro, et al.. (2009). Cross-Site Evaluation of the Supporting Evidence-Based Home Visiting Grantee Cluster: Evaluation Design Volume 1. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.1 indexed citations
14.
Paulsell, Diane, et al.. (2008). Building a CommunityWide Early Learning System White Center at Baseline. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
15.
Grosso, Patricia Del, et al.. (2008). Strategies for Promoting Prevention and Improving Oral Health Care Delivery in Head Start Findings from the Oral Health Initiative Evaluation. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.3 indexed citations
16.
Paulsell, Diane, et al.. (2006). The Enhanced Home Visiting Pilot Project: How Early Head Start Programs Are Reaching out to Kith and Kin Caregivers--Final Interim Report.. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.2 indexed citations
17.
Paulsell, Diane, et al.. (2003). Quality Child Care for Infants and Toddlers Case Studies of Three Community Strategies. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.3 indexed citations
18.
Kisker, Ellen Eliason, Diane Paulsell, John M. Love, & Helen Raikes. (2002). Pathways to Quality and Full Implementation in Early Head Start Programs. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.1 indexed citations
19.
Paulsell, Diane, et al.. (2002). Partnerships for Quality Improving InfantToddler Child Care for LowIncome Families. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.7 indexed citations
20.
Paulsell, Diane, et al.. (2001). Implementing Employment Retention Services in Pennsylvania: Lessons from Community Solutions. Mathematica Policy Research Reports.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.