Diana Dolmans

14.1k total citations · 5 hit papers
216 papers, 9.2k citations indexed

About

Diana Dolmans is a scholar working on Education, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Family Practice. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Dolmans has authored 216 papers receiving a total of 9.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 123 papers in Education, 117 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 41 papers in Family Practice. Recurrent topics in Diana Dolmans's work include Innovations in Medical Education (113 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (67 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (43 papers). Diana Dolmans is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (113 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (67 papers) and Education and Critical Thinking Development (43 papers). Diana Dolmans collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Spain and Taiwan. Diana Dolmans's co-authors include Cees van der Vleuten, Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen, Henk G. Schmidt, Karen Mann, Albert Scherpbier, Willem de Grave, Yvonne Steinert, Angel Centeno, David Prideaux and Willem S. de Grave and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Computers & Education.

In The Last Decade

Diana Dolmans

204 papers receiving 8.4k citations

Hit Papers

A systematic review of faculty development initiatives de... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2006 2005 2016 2015 2024 250 500 750

Peers

Diana Dolmans
Howard S. Barrows United States
Albert Scherpbier Netherlands
Karen Mann Canada
John Sandars United Kingdom
Paul Haidet United States
Steven M. Downing United States
Ronald M. Harden United Kingdom
Howard S. Barrows United States
Diana Dolmans
Citations per year, relative to Diana Dolmans Diana Dolmans (= 1×) peers Howard S. Barrows

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Dolmans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Dolmans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Dolmans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Dolmans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Dolmans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Dolmans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Dolmans. The network helps show where Diana Dolmans may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Dolmans

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Dolmans. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Dolmans based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Dolmans. Diana Dolmans is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Liu, Xian, et al.. (2025). How to close the learning circle? Students’ perspectives on how programmatic assessment influences self-regulated learning in a global online programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 50(8). 1207–1222. 1 indexed citations
2.
Vos, Rien de, et al.. (2025). Team-based learning (TBL) in health professions education: A systematic review on its conceptual elements and outcomes. Medical Teacher. 47(12). 1933–1947. 4 indexed citations
3.
Dolmans, Diana, et al.. (2023). How realist reviews might be helpful to further insights in Problem-Based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. 17(2).
4.
Lidström, Helene, et al.. (2022). Experiences of Dutch and Swedish Occupational Therapists and Teachers of Their Context-Based Collaboration in Elementary Education. Journal of Occupational Therapy Schools & Early Intervention. 17(1). 37–53. 6 indexed citations
5.
Dolmans, Diana, et al.. (2022). Design and evaluation of a team-based interprofessional practice placement: A design-based research approach. Medical Teacher. 44(8). 866–871. 4 indexed citations
6.
Rethans, Jan‐Joost, et al.. (2022). Task complexity and cognitive load in simulation‐based education: A randomised trial. Medical Education. 57(2). 161–169. 11 indexed citations
7.
Piškur, Barbara, et al.. (2022). Targeting the school environment to enable participation: A scoping review. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 30(3). 298–310. 10 indexed citations
8.
Dolmans, Diana, et al.. (2022). Creativity: A viable and valuable competency in medicine? A qualitative exploratory study. Medical Teacher. 44(10). 1158–1164. 11 indexed citations
9.
Nooijer, Jascha de, Diana Dolmans, & Renée E. Stalmeijer. (2021). Applying Landscapes of Practice Principles to the Design of Interprofessional Education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 34(2). 209–214. 16 indexed citations
10.
Driessen, Erik W., et al.. (2021). ‘A roller coaster of emotions’: a phenomenological study on medical students lived experiences of emotions in complex simulation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(1). 24–24. 18 indexed citations
11.
Nooijer, Jascha de, et al.. (2020). Collaborative learning: Elements encouraging and hindering deep approach to learning and use of elaboration strategies. Medical Teacher. 42(11). 1261–1269. 20 indexed citations
12.
Atherley, Anique, Laura Nimmon, Pim W. Teunissen, et al.. (2020). Students' social networks are diverse, dynamic and deliberate when transitioning to clinical training. Medical Education. 55(3). 376–386. 19 indexed citations
13.
Dolmans, Diana, et al.. (2020). A National, Palliative Care Competency Framework for Undergraduate Medical Curricula. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(7). 2396–2396. 19 indexed citations
14.
Leppink, Jimmie, et al.. (2018). Simulation‐based education for novices: complex learning tasks promote reflective practice. Medical Education. 53(4). 380–389. 20 indexed citations
15.
Keuning, Trynke, Marieke van Geel, Jimmy Frèrejean, et al.. (2017). Differentiëren bij rekenen: een cognitieve taakanalyse van het denken en handelen van basisschoolleerkrachten. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 94(3). 160–181. 4 indexed citations
16.
Dolmans, Diana, et al.. (2014). Effective quality management requires a systematic approach and a flexible organisational culture: a qualitative study among academic staff. Quality in Higher Education. 20(1). 103–126. 26 indexed citations
17.
Mainhard, Tim, et al.. (2012). Evaluating clinical teachers with the Maastricht clinical teaching questionnaire: How much ‘teacher’ is in student ratings?. Medical Teacher. 34(4). 320–326. 20 indexed citations
18.
Singaram, Veena S., Cees van der Vleuten, Fred Stevens, & Diana Dolmans. (2010). “For most of us Africans, we don’t just speak”: a qualitative investigation into collaborative heterogeneous PBL group learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 16(3). 297–310. 26 indexed citations
19.
Dolmans, Diana, et al.. (2009). Organisational Values in Higher Education: Perceptions and Preferences of Staff. Quality in Higher Education. 15(3). 233–249. 23 indexed citations
20.
Stalmeijer, Renée E., Diana Dolmans, Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen, Arno Muijtjens, & Albert Scherpbier. (2008). The development of an instrument for evaluating clinical teachers: involving stakeholders to determine content validity. Medical Teacher. 30(8). e272–e277. 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026