Colin Cramer

963 total citations
68 papers, 398 citations indexed

About

Colin Cramer is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Colin Cramer has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 398 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 53 papers in Education, 37 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 18 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Colin Cramer's work include Sociology and Education Studies (35 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (33 papers) and Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (14 papers). Colin Cramer is often cited by papers focused on Sociology and Education Studies (35 papers), Education Methods and Technologies (33 papers) and Teacher Professional Development and Motivation (14 papers). Colin Cramer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Colin Cramer's co-authors include Marcus Pietsch, Martin Rothland, Pierre Tulowitzki, Sigrid Blömeke, Johannes König, Samuel Merk, Chris Brown, Felix Schreiber, David Aldridge and Burak Aydın and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Teaching and Teacher Education and Journal of Teacher Education.

In The Last Decade

Colin Cramer

54 papers receiving 359 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Colin Cramer Germany 11 241 118 114 59 36 68 398
Wendelien Vantieghem Belgium 13 304 1.3× 70 0.6× 81 0.7× 59 1.0× 37 1.0× 34 462
Elena Cocoradă Romania 9 184 0.8× 133 1.1× 53 0.5× 31 0.5× 58 1.6× 24 385
Susan Yonezawa United States 11 389 1.6× 151 1.3× 57 0.5× 42 0.7× 50 1.4× 21 519
Leslie W. Grant United States 8 475 2.0× 48 0.4× 65 0.6× 86 1.5× 19 0.5× 17 581
Nina Jude Germany 9 253 1.0× 105 0.9× 49 0.4× 107 1.8× 28 0.8× 28 434
Helma Oolbekkink-Marchand Netherlands 13 443 1.8× 74 0.6× 54 0.5× 98 1.7× 14 0.4× 32 546
Deniz Deryakulu Türkiye 10 353 1.5× 76 0.6× 43 0.4× 88 1.5× 21 0.6× 47 473
Serena J. Salloum United States 9 259 1.1× 73 0.6× 45 0.4× 38 0.6× 26 0.7× 21 362
Niyazi Özer Türkiye 12 318 1.3× 49 0.4× 81 0.7× 31 0.5× 39 1.1× 61 439
Carl Lamote Belgium 8 392 1.6× 104 0.9× 65 0.6× 52 0.9× 24 0.7× 10 474

Countries citing papers authored by Colin Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Colin Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Colin Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Colin Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Colin Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Colin Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Colin Cramer. The network helps show where Colin Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Colin Cramer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Colin Cramer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Colin Cramer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Colin Cramer. Colin Cramer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pietsch, Marcus, et al.. (2025). Opening the black box of teacher leader development: An investigation of teachers’ motivation to lead. International Journal of Educational Research. 132. 102632–102632.
2.
3.
Cramer, Colin, et al.. (2024). Lehrpersonen lernen: Nutzung und Nützlichkeit von Lerngelegenheiten und deren Beziehung zur Berufserfahrung. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung. 14(1). 71–94. 1 indexed citations
4.
Pietsch, Marcus, et al.. (2024). School leaders’ innovation-related self-efficacy: professional development and learning networks make a difference. Professional Development in Education. 1–14. 2 indexed citations
5.
Edelsbrunner, Peter A., et al.. (2023). When perceived informativity is not enough. How teachers perceive and interpret statistical results of educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education. 130. 104134–104134. 3 indexed citations
6.
Cramer, Colin, et al.. (2023). Nutzung und Bedingungsfaktoren informeller Lerngelegenheiten von Lehrpersonen in Deutschland. Unterrichtswissenschaft. 51(3). 395–421. 2 indexed citations
7.
Cramer, Colin, et al.. (2023). Fortbildung von Schulleitungen in der Berufsbiografie. Programmanalyse zur Qualifizierung schulischer Führungspersonen. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 41(1). 136–150. 2 indexed citations
8.
Pietsch, Marcus, et al.. (2023). Open Innovation in Schools: A New Imperative for Organising Innovation in Education?. Technology Knowledge and Learning. 29(2). 1051–1077. 14 indexed citations
9.
Schreiber, Felix & Colin Cramer. (2023). Was sind Bildungswissenschaften? Systematik vielfältiger Auffassungen in der wissenschaftlichen Literatur. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft. 26(1). 185–210.
10.
Cramer, Colin, et al.. (2023). Heart Rate Variability and Perceived Stress in Teacher Training: Facing the Reality Shock With Mindfulness?. PubMed. 12. 3974827354–3974827354. 5 indexed citations
11.
Schreiber, Felix, et al.. (2022). Aufgaben und Verortungen der Fachdidaktik in wissenschaftlicher Literatur. Systematische Annäherung an den Begriffsgebrauch. BzL - Beiträge zur Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung. 40(1). 97–110. 1 indexed citations
12.
Pietsch, Marcus, et al.. (2022). School leaders’ self-efficacy and its impact on innovation: Findings of a repeated measurement study. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. 52(6). 1477–1496. 13 indexed citations
13.
Pietsch, Marcus, Pierre Tulowitzki, & Colin Cramer. (2022). Innovating teaching and instruction in turbulent times: The dynamics of principals’ exploration and exploitation activities. Journal of Educational Change. 24(3). 549–581. 21 indexed citations
14.
Cramer, Colin, et al.. (2021). Schulleitung in Deutschland. Repräsentative Befunde zur Attraktivität, zu Karrieremotiven und zu Arbeitsplatzwechselabsichten. DDS – Die Deutsche Schule. 2021(2). 132–148. 9 indexed citations
15.
Pietsch, Marcus, et al.. (2020). Leadership in German Schools (LineS2020). OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
16.
Cramer, Colin, et al.. (2020). Schulleitungen in Deutschland - Kurzbericht zur Studie. Institutional Repository (IHS Vienna). 1 indexed citations
17.
Cramer, Colin, et al.. (2019). Meta-Reflexivität und Professionalität im Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerberuf. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. 401–423. 12 indexed citations
18.
Cramer, Colin, et al.. (2019). Die Mentor-Mentee-Beziehung in der schulpraktischen Lehrerbildung: Theoretische Modellierung und Operationalisierung. Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research). 3(1-2019). 28–43.
19.
Bohl, Thorsten, Colin Cramer, & Samuel Merk. (2016). Prädiktive Effekte domänenspezifischer epistemologischer Überzeugungen angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer auf deren Bedeutsamkeitseinschätzung allgemeinen pädagogischen sowie fachdidaktischen Wissens. Unterrichtswissenschaft. 1 indexed citations
20.
Cramer, Colin, et al.. (2015). The relationship between personality traits and burnout among teachers. An international systematic review. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft. 18(1). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026