Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature
2011313 citationsChee‐Kit Looi et al.Computers & Educationprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Chee‐Kit Looi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chee‐Kit Looi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chee‐Kit Looi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chee‐Kit Looi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chee‐Kit Looi. The network helps show where Chee‐Kit Looi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chee‐Kit Looi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chee‐Kit Looi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chee‐Kit Looi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Chee‐Kit Looi. Chee‐Kit Looi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sun, Daner, Chee‐Kit Looi, Yuqin Yang, & Jin Sun. (2020). Design and Implement Boundary Activity Based Learning (BABL) Principle in Science Inquiry: An Exploratory Study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
11.
Sun, Daner, Chee‐Kit Looi, Yuqin Yang, & Jin Sun. (2020). Design and implementation of the boundary activity based learning (BABL) principle in science inquiry: An exploratory study. Educational Technology & Society. 23(4). 147–162.1 indexed citations
12.
Sun, Daner, Chee‐Kit Looi, & Wenting Xie. (2014). Collaborative Inquiry with a Web-Based Science Learning Environment: When Teachers Enact It Differently. Educational Technology & Society. 17(4). 390–403.20 indexed citations
Looi, Chee‐Kit, Wenli Chen, & Charles Patton. (2010). Principles and Enactment of Rapid Collaborative Knowledge Building in Classrooms. Educational Technology archive. 50(5). 26–31.13 indexed citations
So, Hyo‐Jeong, et al.. (2008). Seamless Mobile Learning: Possibilities and Challenges Arising from the Singapore Experience. Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology). 9(2). 97–121.26 indexed citations
19.
Looi, Chee‐Kit, David H. Jonassen, & Mitsuru Ikeda. (2005). Towards sustainable and scalable educational innovations informed by the learning sciences : sharing good practices of research, experimentation and innovation. IOS Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
20.
Looi, Chee‐Kit. (1988). Analysing Novices Programs in a Prolog Intelligent Teaching System.. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 314–319.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.