Catherine Amelink

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
60 papers, 863 citations indexed

About

Catherine Amelink is a scholar working on Media Technology, Education and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine Amelink has authored 60 papers receiving a total of 863 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Media Technology, 29 papers in Education and 17 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in Catherine Amelink's work include Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (23 papers), Career Development and Diversity (17 papers) and Engineering Education and Pedagogy (17 papers). Catherine Amelink is often cited by papers focused on Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (23 papers), Career Development and Diversity (17 papers) and Engineering Education and Pedagogy (17 papers). Catherine Amelink collaborates with scholars based in United States, Austria and India. Catherine Amelink's co-authors include Elliot P. Douglas, Maura Borrego, Elizabeth G. Creamer, Joan B. Hirt, Terrell L. Strayhorn, Peggy S. Meszaros, Joseph G. Tront, Kirsten Davis, Tsu‐Jae King Liu and Yasuo Miyazaki and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Engineering Education and Journal of college student development.

In The Last Decade

Catherine Amelink

50 papers receiving 750 citations

Hit Papers

Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in ... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Catherine Amelink United States 10 411 275 182 101 91 60 863
Nadia Kellam United States 15 546 1.3× 390 1.4× 200 1.1× 146 1.4× 73 0.8× 86 1.2k
Greg Pearson United States 9 786 1.9× 217 0.8× 132 0.7× 111 1.1× 56 0.6× 31 1.2k
Kacey Beddoes United States 18 480 1.2× 520 1.9× 291 1.6× 200 2.0× 149 1.6× 76 1.2k
Lisa McNair United States 14 407 1.0× 389 1.4× 133 0.7× 185 1.8× 94 1.0× 115 1.0k
Stefani A. Bjorklund United States 8 575 1.4× 279 1.0× 57 0.3× 87 0.9× 161 1.8× 17 956
Roger B. Hill United States 16 306 0.7× 134 0.5× 92 0.5× 48 0.5× 78 0.9× 48 841
Brent Jesiek United States 17 764 1.9× 843 3.1× 152 0.8× 233 2.3× 79 0.9× 132 1.5k
Jon A. Leydens United States 20 587 1.4× 594 2.2× 175 1.0× 234 2.3× 52 0.6× 48 1.3k
Şenay Purzer United States 17 592 1.4× 377 1.4× 101 0.6× 206 2.0× 44 0.5× 138 1.2k
Barbara Moskal United States 20 898 2.2× 837 3.0× 160 0.9× 207 2.0× 65 0.7× 86 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Amelink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Amelink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Amelink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Amelink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Amelink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Amelink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Amelink. The network helps show where Catherine Amelink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Amelink

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Amelink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Amelink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Amelink. Catherine Amelink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2024). Campus Climate for Engineering Graduate Students: Examining Differences Between Domestic Minority, Domestic Majority, and International Students. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 4 indexed citations
2.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2023). Transdisciplinary Learning Opportunities: Exploring Differences in Complex Thinking Skill Development Between STEM and Non-STEM Majors. Innovative Higher Education. 49(1). 153–176. 8 indexed citations
3.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2020). Designing and Implementing an Online Offering of a Nuclear Engineering Curriculum. 25.409.1–25.409.12. 1 indexed citations
4.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2020). Measuring Innovative Thinking Skills in Innovation Challenge Activities. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 24.892.1–24.892.8. 1 indexed citations
5.
Amelink, Catherine, Kirsten Davis, & Bevlee Watford. (2019). Learning experiences that facilitate innovation and workforce preparation: exploring the impact of in-class and extracurricular activities. International journal of engineering education. 35(6). 1642–1655. 4 indexed citations
6.
Lee, Walter, et al.. (2017). MOTIVATING INCOMING ENGINEERING STUDENTS WITH DIVERSE BACKGROUNDS: ASSESSING A SUMMER BRIDGE PROGRAM’S IMPACT ON ACADEMIC MOTIVATION. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. 23(2). 121–145. 2 indexed citations
7.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2016). Graduate Summer Bridge Program: Building Community and Preparedness for Success among Engineering Graduate Students. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 2 indexed citations
9.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2015). Examining the Self-Efficacy of Community College STEM Majors: Factors Related to Four-Year Degree Attainment. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 39(12). 1111–1124. 9 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Brett D., et al.. (2013). Educational Innovation in the Design of an Online Nuclear Engineering Curriculum. 13(2). 58–72. 5 indexed citations
12.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2013). EDUCATIONAL AFFORDANCES THAT SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE THINKING SKILLS IN LARGE CLASSES. International Association for Development of the Information Society. 4 indexed citations
13.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2013). inVenTs: Improving retention among STEM majors through a living learning community. 7. 1413–1415. 1 indexed citations
14.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2012). Tablet PC Support of Students' Learning Styles. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4 indexed citations
15.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2012). Student Use of the Tablet PC: Impact on Student Learning Behaviors.. AEE Journal. 3(1). 25 indexed citations
16.
Dancey, C. L., et al.. (2011). Our First Online Offering of Introduction to Thermal-Fluid Engineering. 169–175. 4 indexed citations
17.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2011). Promoting Interactions with Technology: Review of a College-Wide Tablet PC Program. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 55(1). 550–554. 2 indexed citations
18.
Amelink, Catherine, et al.. (2010). Global Scaling up Rural Sanitation Project : progress report (July 1, 2009 - June 30, 2010). 1–52. 1 indexed citations
19.
Hirt, Joan B., et al.. (2005). The Nature of Relationships and Rewards for Student Affairs Professionals at Liberal Arts Institutions.. College student affairs journal. 25(1). 6–19. 1 indexed citations
20.
Hirt, Joan B., et al.. (2004). The Nature of Student Affairs Work in the Liberal Arts College. NASPA Journal. 42(1). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026