Innovative Higher Education

1.2k papers and 19.6k indexed citations

About

The 1.2k papers published in Innovative Higher Education in the last decades have received a total of 19.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Innovative Higher Education usually cover Education (744 papers), Social Psychology (194 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (127 papers) specifically the topics of Higher Education Research Studies (250 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (244 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (108 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Innovative Higher Education are Laura I. Rendón, Susan K. Gardner, Libby V. Morris, Carolin Kreber, Adrianna Kezar, Artur Strzelecki, Ronald D. Simpson, Andrea N. Hunt, Adam Driscoll and Lillian MacNell.

In The Last Decade

Innovative Higher Education

959 papers receiving 16.2k citations

Countries where authors publish in Innovative Higher Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Innovative Higher Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Innovative Higher Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Innovative Higher Education more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Innovative Higher Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Innovative Higher Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Innovative Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026