Amy Bartels

477 citations
10 papers · 298 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Amy Bartels

9 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers

Amy Bartels
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 130
  • Social Psychology 104
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 22
  • General Health Professions 72
  • Gender Studies 26
Replace Ana M. Lucia‐Casademunt with:
Ana M. Lucia‐Casademunt Spain
Aykut Berber United Kingdom
Wee Chan Au United Kingdom
Alessandra Lazazzara Italy
Lucy R. Ford United States
Sandra Idrovo Carlier Colombia
Mercè Mach Spain
Davide de Gennaro Italy
Filomena Buonocore Italy
Esmé Franken Australia
Amy Bartels relative to Ana M. Lucia‐Casademunt Spain Ana M. Lucia‐Casademunt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ana M. Lucia‐Casademunt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy Bartels

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy Bartels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy Bartels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy Bartels more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy Bartels

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy Bartels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy Bartels. The network helps show where Amy Bartels may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Amy Bartels, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy Bartels Line = papers co-authored together Amy Bartels links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2019114
2 202055
3 201851
4 202123
5 202118
6 202116
7 202213
8 20237
9
2006 survey of Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System providers
20061
10
Exploring the Benefits of Asynchronous Online Learning in MNGT 360: Foundations of Organizational Behavior
20210

About Amy Bartels

Amy Bartels is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Online Learning and Analytics (1 paper), Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies (1 paper) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (130 citations), Social Psychology (104 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (22 citations), General Health Professions (72 citations) and Gender Studies (26 citations). Amy Bartels has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Suzanne J. Peterson, Christopher S. Reina, Jennifer D. Nahrgang, Hudson Sessions, Margaret M. Luciano, M. Travis Maynard, Lauren D’Innocenzo, John E. Mathieu, Christine Shropshire and Peggy M. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Personnel Psychology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact