W. Claeys
Impact in
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Potato Plant Research
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Proteins in Food Systems
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Microbial Inactivation Methods
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
Papers in
- Food Science 20
-
- Microbial Inactivation Methods 7
- Co-authors
- Marc HendrickxAndré HuyghebaertKristel De VleeschouwerLieve HermanS. CardoenJan De BlockKoen DewettinckAnn Van Loey
In The Last Decade
W. Claeys
67 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Food Science 1.2k
- Biotechnology 305
- Animal Science and Zoology 252
- Agronomy and Crop Science 171
- Nutrition and Dietetics 228
Countries citing papers authored by W. Claeys
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Claeys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Claeys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Claeys more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Claeys
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Claeys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Claeys. The network helps show where W. Claeys may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Claeys, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 49 | |
| 3 | Raw or heated cow milk consumption: Review of risks and benefits Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 355 |
| 4 | 2010 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 154 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 133 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 84 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 25 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 28 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 52 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 44 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1977 | 11 |
About W. Claeys
W. Claeys is a scholar working on Food Science, Biotechnology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials and Spectroscopy, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (14 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (9 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (7 papers), Microbial Inactivation Methods (7 papers), Thermal properties of materials (6 papers) and Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (1.2k citations), Biotechnology (305 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (252 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (171 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (228 citations). W. Claeys has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, France and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Marc Hendrickx, André Huyghebaert, Kristel De Vleeschouwer, Lieve Herman, S. Cardoen, Jan De Block, Koen Dewettinck, Ann Van Loey, Claire Verraes and S. Dilhaire. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Research, Microelectronics Reliability, Food Control, Quality and Reliability Engineering International and Trends in Food Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.