Georges Daube is a scholar working on Food Science, Molecular Biology and Infectious Diseases.
According to data from OpenAlex, Georges Daube has authored 286 papers receiving a total of 7.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 118 papers in Food Science, 83 papers in Molecular Biology and 78 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Georges Daube's work include Gut microbiota and health (56 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (54 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (52 papers). Georges Daube is often cited by papers focused on Gut microbiota and health (56 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (54 papers) and Probiotics and Fermented Foods (52 papers). Georges Daube collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, France and Spain. Georges Daube's co-authors include Bernard Taminiau, Jacques Mainil, Véronique Delcenserie, Katelijne Dierick, Lieven De Zutter, Bernard China, C. Rodríguez, Nicolas Korsak, Y. Ghafir and Yvan Vandenplas and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
In The Last Decade
Georges Daube
269 papers
receiving
7.1k citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Antimicrobial Resistance in the Food Chain: A Review
This map shows the geographic impact of Georges Daube's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georges Daube with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georges Daube more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georges Daube. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georges Daube. The network helps show where Georges Daube may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Georges Daube
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Georges Daube.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Georges Daube based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Georges Daube. Georges Daube is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
China, Bernard, et al.. (2018). Research and characterization of Escherichia coli O157 strains isolated from ovine carcasses of two slaughterhouses of Algiers city. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).3 indexed citations
8.
Daube, Georges, et al.. (2014). Isolation and identification of dominant osmophilic Leuconostoc strains from traditional date product “Btana”. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).5 indexed citations
9.
Boone, Idesbald, Yves Van der Stede, Kaatje Bollaerts, et al.. (2008). A structured expert judgement study on Salmonella spp. in pork: analyses of different weighting schemes.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
10.
Korsak, Nicolas, et al.. (2002). Écologie de Salmonella dans le tube digestif du porc à l'abattage et étude de la contamination des carcasses. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).4 indexed citations
11.
Daube, Georges. (2002). Micro-organismes pathogènes et viande : la traçabilité alliée de la sécurité.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
12.
China, Bernard, et al.. (2001). Traçabilité dans la filière viande. I. La traçabilité administrative.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
13.
Clinquart, Antoine, et al.. (2001). Traçabilité dans la filière viande. 2. Les marqueurs génétiques.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).
14.
Scipioni, Alexandra, Georges Daube, & Étienne Thiry. (2000). La contamination de l'eau et des aliments par les virus pathogènes pour l'homme. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
15.
Daube, Georges, et al.. (2000). L'entérotoxémie bovine en Belgique. II. Epizootiologie élémentaire et pathologie descriptive.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).11 indexed citations
16.
Daube, Georges & F van Loock. (1997). Surveillance des « Toxi-Infections d’origine Alimentaire » en Belgique. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).2 indexed citations
17.
Phukan, A., et al.. (1997). Characterization of Clostridium perfringens isolates from goats.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
18.
Daube, Georges, et al.. (1996). L'entérotoxémie bovine: rôle de Clostridium perfringens. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
19.
Mainil, Jacques, Georges Daube, E. Jacquemin, A. Kaeckenbeeck, & P. Pohl. (1995). Typage des Escherichia coli isolées d'intestins de porcelets en Belgique au moyen de sondes génétiques : souches entérotoxinogènes, vérotoxinogènes ou entéropathogènes.. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).3 indexed citations
20.
Collard, A., et al.. (1993). Caractérisation et typage de souches de Clostridium perfringens par la méthode ELISA. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.