Timothy J. Newby

7.5k total citations · 3 hit papers
79 papers, 4.6k citations indexed

About

Timothy J. Newby is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Timothy J. Newby has authored 79 papers receiving a total of 4.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Education, 30 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 12 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Timothy J. Newby's work include Online and Blended Learning (26 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (21 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (10 papers). Timothy J. Newby is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (26 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (21 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (10 papers). Timothy J. Newby collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Taiwan. Timothy J. Newby's co-authors include Peggy A. Ertmer, Ayesha Sadaf, Krista Glazewski, Anne Ottenbreit‐Leftwich, Ling Wang, Robert L. Bill, Ya-Ting Carolyn Yang, Helen E. Ritchie, Donald A. Stepich and Zui Cheng and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Immunology, Journal of Educational Psychology and Computers & Education.

In The Last Decade

Timothy J. Newby

75 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Hit Papers

Behaviorism, Cognitivism,... 1993 2026 2004 2015 1993 2010 2013 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Timothy J. Newby United States 29 3.0k 1.4k 783 520 466 79 4.6k
J. Michael Spector United States 35 2.8k 0.9× 1.3k 1.0× 1.2k 1.5× 1.2k 2.3× 416 0.9× 172 5.2k
Thomas Brush United States 25 3.1k 1.1× 1.2k 0.9× 907 1.2× 618 1.2× 824 1.8× 103 4.3k
Gerald Knezek United States 31 2.2k 0.7× 653 0.5× 1.1k 1.4× 429 0.8× 522 1.1× 197 3.5k
Eugene Borokhovski Canada 22 4.1k 1.4× 1.6k 1.1× 846 1.1× 983 1.9× 482 1.0× 64 5.4k
Robin Kay Canada 31 2.4k 0.8× 585 0.4× 774 1.0× 688 1.3× 600 1.3× 143 3.6k
R Bernard Canada 31 4.8k 1.6× 2.1k 1.5× 953 1.2× 1.2k 2.2× 503 1.1× 112 7.3k
Chang Zhu Belgium 36 3.4k 1.1× 889 0.6× 1.4k 1.8× 832 1.6× 589 1.3× 240 5.2k
Barbara Means United States 32 4.1k 1.4× 1.4k 1.0× 972 1.2× 1.5k 2.9× 570 1.2× 70 6.7k
Yong Zhao United States 36 3.7k 1.2× 933 0.7× 957 1.2× 526 1.0× 1.4k 3.0× 131 5.8k
Barney Dalgarno Australia 27 1.9k 0.6× 1.0k 0.7× 873 1.1× 557 1.1× 640 1.4× 93 3.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Timothy J. Newby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timothy J. Newby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothy J. Newby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothy J. Newby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timothy J. Newby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothy J. Newby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothy J. Newby. The network helps show where Timothy J. Newby may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Timothy J. Newby

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Timothy J. Newby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Timothy J. Newby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Timothy J. Newby. Timothy J. Newby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Maeda, Yukiko, et al.. (2023). Individual differences in preservice teachers’ online self-regulated learning capacity: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education. 207. 104926–104926. 6 indexed citations
3.
Exter, Marisa, et al.. (2022). Effect of Best Possible Self Writing Activities on Preservice Teachers' Attitudes towards Technology Integration. TechTrends. 66(4). 654–665. 8 indexed citations
6.
Besser, Erin D. & Timothy J. Newby. (2020). Feedback in a Digital Badge Learning Experience: Considering the Instructor’s Perspective. TechTrends. 64(3). 484–497. 12 indexed citations
7.
Besser, Erin D. & Timothy J. Newby. (2019). Exploring the Role of Feedback and its Impact within a Digital Badge System from Student Perspectives. TechTrends. 63(4). 485–495. 16 indexed citations
8.
Newby, Timothy J. & Zui Cheng. (2019). Instructional digital badges: effective learning tools. Educational Technology Research and Development. 68(3). 1053–1067. 33 indexed citations
9.
Magana, Alejandra J., Timothy J. Newby, & Sean Brophy. (2012). Comparing Novice and Expert Perceptions of Interactive Multimedia Tools for Conveying Conceptions of Size and Scale. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 20(4). 441–465. 1 indexed citations
10.
Newby, Timothy J., et al.. (2012). Impact of static graphics, animated graphics and mental imagery on a complex learning task. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 28(1). 8 indexed citations
11.
Ertmer, Peggy A., et al.. (2011). Students’ confidence and perceived value for participating in cross-cultural wiki-based collaborations. Educational Technology Research and Development. 59(2). 213–228. 59 indexed citations
12.
Ottenbreit‐Leftwich, Anne, Krista Glazewski, & Timothy J. Newby. (2010). Preservice Technology Integration Course Revision: A Conceptual Guide. The Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 18(1). 5–33. 17 indexed citations
13.
Ottenbreit‐Leftwich, Anne, Krista Glazewski, Timothy J. Newby, & Peggy A. Ertmer. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education. 55(3). 1321–1335. 449 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Brophy, Sean, et al.. (2009). Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions of Web-based Interactive Media: Three Different Tools One Learning Goal. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2009(1). 1502–1509. 1 indexed citations
15.
Lehman, James Daniel, et al.. (2009). Impact of Asynchronous Online Discussions: A Study of Implementation in Two Large-Enrollment Blended Courses. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2009(1). 2928–2936. 1 indexed citations
16.
Yang, Ya-Ting Carolyn & Timothy J. Newby. (2001). Does Distance Education Resolve The Current Problems of Education. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2001(1). 304–309. 1 indexed citations
17.
Lehman, James Daniel, et al.. (1998). Distance Learning Models for In-Service and Pre-Service Education. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 1998(1). 138–141.
18.
Ertmer, Peggy A. & Timothy J. Newby. (1993). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from a Design Perspective.. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 6(4). 50–72. 114 indexed citations
19.
Newby, Timothy J.. (1991). Classroom motivation: Strategies of first-year teachers.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 83(2). 195–200. 112 indexed citations
20.
Newby, Timothy J., et al.. (1988). Visual mediational instruction: Reducing interference within visual and aural multiple-discrimination tasks.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 80(1). 40–45. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026