Thomas M. Schwen

34 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers

Thomas M. Schwen
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Education 169
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 114
  • Communication 92
  • Computer Science Applications 51
  • Sociology and Political Science 48
Replace Martin Dyke with:
Martin Dyke United Kingdom
Ellen Sjoer Netherlands
Saul Carliner Canada
Ditte Lockhorst Netherlands
Ming Nie United Kingdom
Richard F. Kenny Canada
Patrick M. Jenlink United States
Marsha King United States
Dean R. Spitzer United States
G.M. Benscoter
Thomas M. Schwen relative to Martin Dyke United Kingdom Martin Dyke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Martin Dyke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Schwen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Schwen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Schwen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Schwen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Schwen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Schwen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Schwen. The network helps show where Thomas M. Schwen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas M. Schwen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas M. Schwen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas M. Schwen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas M. Schwen. Thomas M. Schwen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 3
3 5
4 19
5 1
6 14
7
Building learning systems: a study of the design and implementation of two corporate learning systems
0
8 18
9
A Framework for Instructional Development in Corporate Education.
3
10 4
11
On the Design of an Enriched Learning and Information Environment (ELIE)
16
12 1
13 13
14 5
15
Cognitive Styles: Boon or Bane?.
2
16
Instructional Development: A Social Intervention?.
0
17
Professional Scholarship in Educational Technology: Criteria for Judging Inquiry.
8
18
The Documentation of Instructional Development.
4
19 1
20
Some Process Concerns about Formative Evaluation.
1

About Thomas M. Schwen

Thomas M. Schwen is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Communication and Computer Science Applications, having authored 37 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (33 citations), Communication (92 citations) and Computer Science Applications (51 citations). Thomas M. Schwen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Noriko Hara, Yu-chen Hsu, Michael A. Evans, Ivor K. Davies, Xiaojing Liu, Jeng‐Yi Tzeng, Eun-Ok Baek, John M. Keller, Sharon A. Shrock and Feng‐Kwei Wang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Educational Technology Research and Development and The Information Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026