Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Susan Fournier
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Fournier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Fournier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Fournier more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Fournier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Fournier. The network helps show where Susan Fournier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Fournier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Fournier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Fournier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Fournier. Susan Fournier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Avery, Jill, et al.. (2014). Unlock the Mysteries of Your Customer Relationships. Harvard business review. 92(7). 72–81.18 indexed citations
10.
Fournier, Susan & Claudio Alvarez. (2013). Relating Badly to Brands. SSRN Electronic Journal.
11.
Fournier, Susan, Giana M. Eckhardt, & Fleura Bardhi. (2013). Learning to Play in the New "Share Economy". Harvard business review. 91(7). 125–129.16 indexed citations
Fournier, Susan & Claudio Alvarez. (2011). Brand Flings and the Transitional Self. ACR North American Advances.3 indexed citations
14.
Brunel, Frédéric F., Benjamin Lawrence, & Susan Fournier. (2010). Towards a Contingency Theory of Consumers’ Engagement With Cgas. ACR North American Advances.1 indexed citations
15.
Paulssen, Marcel & Susan Fournier. (2007). Attachment Security and the Strength of Commercial Relationships: A Longitudinal Study. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).22 indexed citations
16.
Fournier, Susan, Susan Dobscha, & David Glen Mick. (1998). En terapia intensiva. 3(6). 42–52.1 indexed citations
17.
Fournier, Susan. (1998). Special Session Summary Consumer Resistance: Societal Motivations, Consumer Manifestations, and Implications in the Marketing Domain. ACR North American Advances.16 indexed citations
18.
Fournier, Susan, et al.. (1995). Technological consumer products in everyday life : ownership, meaning, and satisfaction : working paper. Marketing Science Institute eBooks.16 indexed citations
19.
Guiry, Michael D. & Susan Fournier. (1993). `An emerald green jaguar, a house on Nantucket, and an African safari:' Wish lists and. Advances in consumer research. 20(1). 352–358.22 indexed citations
20.
Fournier, Susan. (1991). Meaning-Based Framework For the Study of Consumer-Object Relations. ACR North American Advances.76 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.