Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Consumer engagement in online brand communities: a social media perspective
2015818 citationsCleopatra Veloutsou, Anna Morgan‐Thomas et al.profile →
Capturing consumer engagement: duality, dimensionality and measurement
2016407 citationsCleopatra Veloutsou, Anna Morgan‐Thomas et al.profile →
Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience
Citations per year, relative to Cleopatra Veloutsou Cleopatra Veloutsou (= 1×)
peers
Susan Fournier
Countries citing papers authored by Cleopatra Veloutsou
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Cleopatra Veloutsou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cleopatra Veloutsou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cleopatra Veloutsou more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cleopatra Veloutsou
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cleopatra Veloutsou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cleopatra Veloutsou. The network helps show where Cleopatra Veloutsou may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cleopatra Veloutsou
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cleopatra Veloutsou.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cleopatra Veloutsou based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Cleopatra Veloutsou. Cleopatra Veloutsou is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi, Cleopatra Veloutsou, & George Christodoulides. (2017). Managing the Consumer-Based Brand Equity Process Across Countries. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
3.
Chatzipanagiotou, Kalliopi, Cleopatra Veloutsou, & George Christodoulides. (2016). The Consumer-Based Brand Equity Process: An fs/Qualitative Comparative Analysis Approach. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).
4.
Veloutsou, Cleopatra, et al.. (2015). Identifying the Nature of Consumer’s eWOM Activity on Facebook Brand Pages: an Exploratory Study. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
5.
Tsiotsou, Rodoula H. & Cleopatra Veloutsou. (2012). Tribe: measuring tribal behavior in service brands. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).2 indexed citations
6.
Christodoulides, George, John W. Cadogan, Cleopatra Veloutsou, & Leslie de Chernatony. (2012). Revisiting brand equity: evidence from three European countries. BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London).3 indexed citations
7.
Veloutsou, Cleopatra & Rodoula H. Tsiotsou. (2011). Examining the Link between Brand Relationships and Tribal Behaviour: A Structural Model. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
8.
Veloutsou, Cleopatra & George Christodoulides. (2011). European Study of Brand Equity. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
9.
Tsiotsou, Rodoula H. & Cleopatra Veloutsou. (2011). The Role of Brand Personality on Brand Relationships and Tribal Behavior: An Integrative Model. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).2 indexed citations
10.
Veloutsou, Cleopatra, et al.. (2009). Brand Communities, Subcultures of Consumption, Neo-tribes: a Melange of Terminology. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).5 indexed citations
11.
Veloutsou, Cleopatra, et al.. (2009). Searching on the Internet: What Will Make Teenagers Loyal to a Search Engine?. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
12.
Christodoulides, George & Cleopatra Veloutsou. (2009). The Impact of Self Congruity and Brand Relationships on Brand Equity Facets. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).4 indexed citations
13.
Veloutsou, Cleopatra. (2006). The Role of the Overall Evaluation of Brands and Brand Relationship in the Development of Loyalty. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
14.
Veloutsou, Cleopatra, et al.. (2005). Brand Expression and Brand Reputation: Developing Consistency. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
Veloutsou, Cleopatra, et al.. (2005). Marketing Analytics: Managing Incomplete Information in Consumer Markets and the Contribution of Mathematics to the Accountability of Marketing Decisions. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).4 indexed citations
17.
Veloutsou, Cleopatra, et al.. (2003). Retail Banking Image and Customer Loyalty: The Greek Experience. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).1 indexed citations
Panigyrakis, George G. & Cleopatra Veloutsou. (1997). Interfaces of the Product/Brand Manager – A Cross Sector Analysis in Consumer Goods Companies. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).3 indexed citations
20.
Panigyrakis, George G. & Cleopatra Veloutsou. (1995). The Brand Management of Consumer Products in Greece – A Comparison Study of Gender Differences Based on Individual Characteristics and Job Related Factors. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.