Harvard business review

1.9k papers and 86.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Harvard business review in the last decades have received a total of 86.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Harvard business review usually cover Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (224 papers), Economics and Econometrics (108 papers) and Accounting (98 papers) specifically the topics of Organizational Management and Innovation (189 papers), Business, Innovation, and Economy (83 papers) and Business, Education, Mathematics Research (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Harvard business review are Darko Milošević, Marshall L. Fisher, Henry Mintzberg, Thomas O. Jones, Robert S. Kaplan, John R. Hauser, David A. Garvin, D. P. Norton, Gary Hamel and Krishna G. Palepu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Harvard business review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Harvard business review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Harvard business review.

Countries where authors publish in Harvard business review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Harvard business review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Harvard business review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harvard business review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025