Journal of Consumer Psychology

1.5k papers and 93.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Journal of Consumer Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 93.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Consumer Psychology usually cover Marketing (824 papers), Sociology and Political Science (577 papers) and Social Psychology (463 papers) specifically the topics of Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (735 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (388 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (266 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Consumer Psychology are Dawn Iacobucci, Jennifer Edson Escalas, Norbert Schwarz, Aradhna Krishna, Jonah Berger, Alexander Chernev, C. Whan Park, Deborah J. MacInnis, Durairaj Maheswaran and Wendy W. Moe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Consumer Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Consumer Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Consumer Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Consumer Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Consumer Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Consumer Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Consumer Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025