Michelle Searle

428 total citations
37 papers, 231 citations indexed

About

Michelle Searle is a scholar working on Education, Management Science and Operations Research and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle Searle has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 231 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Education, 18 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 8 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Michelle Searle's work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (18 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (7 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers). Michelle Searle is often cited by papers focused on Evaluation and Performance Assessment (18 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (7 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers). Michelle Searle collaborates with scholars based in Canada and Saudi Arabia. Michelle Searle's co-authors include Marianne A. Larsen, Christopher DeLuca, Cheryl Poth, Lyn M. Shulha, Don A. Klinger, Catherine W. Donnelly, Heather M. Brown, Amanda Cooper, Stephen MacGregor and Mélissa Tremblay and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Teaching and Teacher Education and Evaluation and Program Planning.

In The Last Decade

Michelle Searle

35 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Michelle Searle

EDUCA

MSOR

SPS

GHP

ISM

Tone Kvernbekk Norway

Seppo Hämäläinen United Kingdom

Sarah Winchell Lenhoff United States

Valentina Klenowski Australia

Amy Vetter United States

Sue Swaffield United Kingdom

Naida C. Tushnet United States

Diane Stark Rentner

Rachel Roegman United States

Ed Bengtson United States

Tone Kvernbekk Norway

Michelle Searle

164 ×1.2

EDUCA

17 ×0.3

MSOR

57 ×1.5

SPS

16 ×0.5

GHP

30 ×1.0

ISM

Citations per year, relative to Michelle Searle Michelle Searle (= 1×) peers Tone Kvernbekk

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Searle

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Searle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Searle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Searle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Searle

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Searle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Searle. The network helps show where Michelle Searle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Searle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Searle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Searle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Searle. Michelle Searle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gokiert, Rebecca, et al.. (2024). Evaluation Capacity Building: Experiential Learning Through Community–University Collaboratives. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 38(3). 504–520. 2 indexed citations

Bourgeois, Isabelle, et al.. (2024). Strengthening Evaluation Capacity Building Practice Through Competition: The Max Bell School of Public Policy’s Evaluation Capacity Case Challenge. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 38(3). 521–531. 4 indexed citations

Searle, Michelle, et al.. (2024). Learning From Evaluation Data: Discoveries From the Inaugural Evaluation Capacity Case Challenge. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 38(3). 542–554. 3 indexed citations

Searle, Michelle, et al.. (2024). Meeting the Challenge: How the City of Kingston Is Working to Propel Evaluation Growth. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 38(3). 555–565. 3 indexed citations

Searle, Michelle, et al.. (2024). Examining an Interdisciplinary Experiential Learning Program for Doctoral Students. 7(2).

Searle, Michelle, et al.. (2023). Learning by linking the Canadian Evaluation Society's student case competition within a graduate evaluation course. New Directions for Evaluation. 2023(177). 105–113. 2 indexed citations

Searle, Michelle, et al.. (2022). Michael D. Fetters. (2020). The Mixed Methods Research Workbook: Activities for Designing Implementing, and Publishing Projects .. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 36(3). 414–416. 1 indexed citations

Poth, Cheryl & Michelle Searle. (2022). Why a Focus on Integration and Complex Mixed Methods Evaluation Designs?: Introducing this Special Issue of the Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 36(3). 257–261. 2 indexed citations

Searle, Michelle, et al.. (2022). Learning and Leading: Integrating Mixed Methods in a Collaborative Approach to Educational Evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 36(3). 376–390. 1 indexed citations

10.

Poth, Cheryl & Michelle Searle. (2021). Competency-Based Evaluation Education: Four Essential Things to Know and Do. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 35(3). 296–309. 6 indexed citations

11.

Searle, Michelle & Cheryl Poth. (2021). Collaborative Evaluation Designs as an Authentic Course Assessment. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 35(3). 422–436. 5 indexed citations

12.

Searle, Michelle, et al.. (2021). Illuminating Transformative Learning/Assessment: Infusing Creativity, Reciprocity, and Care Into Higher Education. Journal of Transformative Education. 19(4). 339–365. 5 indexed citations

13.

Searle, Michelle, et al.. (2020). Scope Creep and Purposeful Pivots in Developmental Evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 35(1). 92–103. 2 indexed citations

14.

Poth, Cheryl, et al.. (2020). Assessing competency-based evaluation course impacts: A mixed methods case study. Evaluation and Program Planning. 79. 101789–101789. 16 indexed citations

15.

Searle, Michelle, et al.. (2019). A coaching partnership: resource teachers and classroom teachers teaching collaboratively in regular classrooms. British Journal of Special Education. 47(1). 24–47. 5 indexed citations

16.

Searle, Michelle, et al.. (2017). A Case Study of the Guiding Principles for Collaborative Approaches to Evaluation in a Developmental Evaluation Context. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 31(3). 350–373. 3 indexed citations

17.

Poth, Cheryl & Michelle Searle. (2017). Introduction — Setting the Evaluation Use Context. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 31(3). 275–283. 2 indexed citations

18.

Donnelly, Catherine W. & Michelle Searle. (2017). Optimizing Use in the Field of Program Evaluation by Integrating Learning from the Knowledge Field. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 31(3). 305–327. 8 indexed citations

19.

Searle, Michelle & Lyn M. Shulha. (2016). Capturing the Imagination: Arts-Informed Inquiry as a Method in Program Evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 31(1). 34–60. 3 indexed citations

20.

DeLuca, Christopher, et al.. (2010). Conceptions of doctoral education: the PhD as pathmaking. Reflective Practice. 11(5). 657–668. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact