Barthélemy Chollet

20 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Barthélemy Chollet
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 120
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 111
  • Strategy and Management 108
  • Sociology and Political Science 57
  • Accounting 37
Replace Michiel Pieter Tempelaar with:
Michiel Pieter Tempelaar Netherlands
Priscilla Sarai Kraft Germany
Karina Skovvang Christensen Denmark
Alenka Slavec Slovenia
Caren Brenda Scheepers South Africa
Antonio Revilla Spain
Erik Døving Norway
Wendy‐Ann Smith Australia
Yender Lee Canada
Simon Oertel Germany
Barthélemy Chollet relative to Michiel Pieter Tempelaar Netherlands Michiel Pieter Tempelaar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michiel Pieter Tempelaar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barthélemy Chollet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barthélemy Chollet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barthélemy Chollet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barthélemy Chollet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barthélemy Chollet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barthélemy Chollet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barthélemy Chollet. The network helps show where Barthélemy Chollet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barthélemy Chollet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barthélemy Chollet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barthélemy Chollet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Barthélemy Chollet. Barthélemy Chollet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 3
4 9
5 18
6 19
7 1
8 24
9 38
10 58
11 9
12 23
13
Management et réseaux sociaux
0
14 13
15 8
16 47
17
L'analyse des réseaux personnels dans les organisations : quelles données utiliser ?
1
18
Les croyances des étudiants envers la création d'entreprise
7
19
Qu'est-ce qu'un bon réseau personnel ?
1
20 10

About Barthélemy Chollet

Barthélemy Chollet is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 23 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Strategy and Innovation (7 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (6 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (120 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (111 citations) and Business and International Management (20 citations). Barthélemy Chollet has collaborated with scholars based in France, Luxembourg and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Mothe, Sandrine Émin, Jean‐Pierre Boissin, Maréva Sabatier, Olivier Trendel, Anis Khedhaouria, Isabelle Huault, Giuseppe Soda, Gazi Islam and Toshio Murase. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Journal of Business Research and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026