M. Lobo
- Biochemistry top 0.2%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities 15
- Food Science top 0.5%
- Botanical Research and Applications 12
- Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods 4
-
- Papaya Research and Applications 7
- Mangiferin and Mango Extracts 5
- Forestry top 1%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management 18
- Banana Cultivation and Research 8
- Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies 6
M. Lobo
62 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Biochemistry 1.1k
- Food Science 1.1k
- Complementary and alternative medicine 344
- Forestry 147
- Plant Science 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by M. Lobo
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Lobo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Lobo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Lobo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Lobo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Lobo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Lobo. The network helps show where M. Lobo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. Lobo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 170 | |
| 14 | Alcoholic Beverages Obtained from Black Mulberry | 2003 | 55 |
| 15 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 16 | Use of molecular markers as the basis for genetic improvement in the genus Passiflora L. | 1998 | 1 |
| 17 | 1996 | 14 | |
| 18 | Phoma andina var. crystalliniformis var. nov., a new pathogen of tomato and potato in the Andes. | 1986 | 2 |
| 19 | Madurez fisiológica de las semillas de tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) | 1984 | 1 |
| 20 | El cultivo del lulo o naranjilla (solanum quitoense lam) | 1983 | 4 |
About M. Lobo
M. Lobo is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Complementary and alternative medicine, Food Science, Plant Science and Forestry, having authored 66 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (18 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (15 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (12 papers), Banana Cultivation and Research (8 papers), Papaya Research and Applications (7 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (6 papers), Mangiferin and Mango Extracts (5 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (1.1k citations), Food Science (1.1k citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (344 citations), Forestry (147 citations) and Plant Science (1.1k citations). M. Lobo has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Mexico and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Mónica González, Eva Dorta, Sunil Pareek, Elhadi M. Yahia, Narashans Alok Sagar, Sunil Sharma, Rafaela González‐Montelongo, Begoña de Ancos, M. Pilar Cano and Concepción Sánchez-Moreno. Their work appears in journals such as Foods, Food Chemistry, Journal of Food Science, LWT and Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.