Forestry

144.8k papers and 1.7M indexed citations i.

About

144.8k papers covering Forestry have received a total of 1.7M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of African Botany and Ecology Studies, Agricultural and Food Sciences and Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems and also cover the fields of Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Agronomy and Crop Science. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. Some of the most active scholars covering Forestry are Harri Lorenzi, Rattan Lal, Daniel H. Janzen, P. K. R. Nair, Pichu Rengasamy, G. E. Wickens, S. J. McNaughton, Marcelo Cabido, Sandra Dı́az and David J. Currie.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Forestry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Forestry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Forestry.

Countries where authors publish papers about Forestry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Forestry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Forestry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forestry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026