Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry-Based STEM Professional Development for Elementary Teachers
2013257 citationsLouis S. Nadelson, Janet Callahan et al.The Journal of Educational Researchprofile →
Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future
2017192 citationsLouis S. Nadelson, Anne SeifertThe Journal of Educational Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Louis S. Nadelson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Louis S. Nadelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis S. Nadelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis S. Nadelson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louis S. Nadelson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis S. Nadelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis S. Nadelson. The network helps show where Louis S. Nadelson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louis S. Nadelson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louis S. Nadelson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louis S. Nadelson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Louis S. Nadelson. Louis S. Nadelson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Villanueva, Idalis & Louis S. Nadelson. (2017). Are we preparing our students to become engineers of the future or the past. International journal of engineering education. 33(2). 639–652.17 indexed citations
10.
Nadelson, Louis S.. (2016). The Influence and Outcomes of a STEM Education Research Faculty Community of Practice.. Journal of STEM education. 17(1). 44–51.2 indexed citations
11.
Nadelson, Louis S., Don L. Warner, & E. S. Brown. (2015). Life's Lessons in the Lab: A Summer of Learning from Undergraduate Research Experiences.. Scholar Works (Boise State University). 16(3). 5–12.9 indexed citations
Nadelson, Louis S., et al.. (2014). Educators Perceptions and Knowledge of the Common Core State Standards. Issues in teacher education. 23(2). 47–66.5 indexed citations
Shadle, Susan E., Louis S. Nadelson, & Janet Callahan. (2012). Promoting STEM Faculty Members' Reflection on Their Teaching Practice.2 indexed citations
17.
Nadelson, Louis S., et al.. (2012). It Takes a School: Exploring the Relationship between Professional Learning Communities and Student Achievement.. Teacher education & practice. 25(3). 402–421.3 indexed citations
18.
Nadelson, Louis S. & Janet Callahan. (2011). A Comparison of Two Engineering Outreach Programs for Adolescents. Scholar Works (Boise State University). 12(1). 43–54.23 indexed citations
Nadelson, Louis S.. (1995). Thermocouples Take the Heat: Gathering Data with Computer- Interfaced Technology. The Science Teacher. 62(3). 30–33.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.