This map shows the geographic impact of Pam Briggs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pam Briggs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pam Briggs more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pam Briggs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pam Briggs. The network helps show where Pam Briggs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pam Briggs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pam Briggs.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pam Briggs based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Pam Briggs. Pam Briggs is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kirkham, Reuben, Stephen Lindsay, James Nicholson, et al.. (2023). Designing for the Embedding of Employee Voice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 7(CSCW1). 1–31.4 indexed citations
Fernández, Miriam, et al.. (2016). Identifying important life events from Twitter using semantic and syntactic patterns. Open Research Online (The Open University). 143–150.3 indexed citations
9.
Dunphy, Paul, James Nicholson, Vasilis Vlachokyriakos, Pam Briggs, & Patrick Olivier. (2015). Crowdsourcing and CCTV: the Effect of Interface, Financial Bonus and Video Type. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).2 indexed citations
10.
Jeske, Debora, Lynne Coventry, Pam Briggs, & Aad van Moorsel. (2014). Nudging whom how: Nudging whom how: IT proficiency, impulse control and secure behaviour. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).10 indexed citations
Coventry, Lynne, Debora Jeske, & Pam Briggs. (2014). Perceptions and actions: Combining privacy and risk perceptions to better understand user behaviour. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).4 indexed citations
13.
McNeill, Andrew & Pam Briggs. (2014). Understanding Twitter Influence in the Health Domain: A social-psychological contribution. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).5 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, Lisa & Pam Briggs. (2013). Teenagers' attitudes and design values around identity management. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).1 indexed citations
15.
Briggs, Pam, Claire Hardy, Elizabeth Sillence, & Peter R. Harris. (2013). An engagement framework for understanding the communication needs of different health groups. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).1 indexed citations
16.
Nadelson, Louis S., et al.. (2012). The Tension Between Teacher Accountability and Flexibility: The Paradox of Standards-Based Reform. Scholar Works (Boise State University). 25(2). 196–220.9 indexed citations
17.
Hardy, Claire, Elizabeth Sillence, Pam Briggs, & Peter R. Harris. (2012). Engaging With Online Patient Experiences : Exploring Differences Between Health Groups. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).1 indexed citations
18.
Little, Linda & Pam Briggs. (2006). Investigating privacy in an ambient world. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).2 indexed citations
19.
Little, Linda & Pam Briggs. (2005). Designing ambient intelligent scenarios to promote discussion of human values. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).3 indexed citations
20.
Briggs, Pam. (1988). Usability assessment for the office: methodological choices and their implications. 381–401.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.