Pam Briggs

160 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Pam Briggs's Hit Papers

How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? 2007 · 506 citations
5060+6+12Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Pam Briggs
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Human-Computer Interaction 509
  • Information Systems and Management 341
  • Communication 301
  • Applied Psychology 180
  • Health 228
Replace Yin‐Leng Theng with:
Yin‐Leng Theng Singapore
Jenny Waycott Australia
Anja S. Göritz Germany
Steve Howard Australia
Paul van Schaik United Kingdom
Sunyoung Park United States
Wei Peng United States
Steve Wheeler United Kingdom
Pei‐Luen Patrick Rau China
Shanyang Zhao United States
Pam Briggs relative to Yin‐Leng Theng Singapore Yin‐Leng Theng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Yin‐Leng Theng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pam Briggs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pam Briggs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pam Briggs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pam Briggs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pam Briggs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pam Briggs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pam Briggs. The network helps show where Pam Briggs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pam Briggs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pam Briggs Line = papers co-authored together Pam Briggs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 164 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information?
Hit paper breakdown →
2007506
2 2004153
3 2006142
4 2018138
5 2011116
6 2006106
7 2002102
8 201089
9 200283
10 201769
11 201668
12 198267
13 201166
14 200659
15 201756
16 202151
17 201551
18 198449
19 201949
20 201249

About Pam Briggs

Pam Briggs is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems, Demography and General Health Professions, having authored 164 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (30 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (29 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (25 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (20 papers), Information and Cyber Security (13 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (13 papers), User Authentication and Security Systems (13 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (509 citations), Information Systems and Management (341 citations), Communication (301 citations), Applied Psychology (180 citations) and Health (228 citations). Pam Briggs has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Sillence, Peter R. Harris, Lesley Fishwick, Lynne Coventry, Lisa Thomas, Geoffrey Underwood, James Nicholson, Linda Little, Bryan Burford and Catherine V. Talbot. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Frontiers in Psychology, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Interacting with Computers and Social Science Computer Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact