Laurie Elish‐Piper

566 citations
22 papers · 334 indexed · h-index 9

Laurie Elish‐Piper

15 papers receiving 242 citations

Peers

Laurie Elish‐Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 167
  • Education 274
  • Literature and Literary Theory 76
  • Linguistics and Language 17
  • Language and Linguistics 27
Replace Virginia J. Goatley with:
Virginia J. Goatley United States
Margaret F. Quinn United States
Denise N. Morgan United States
Rafael Heller United States
Jim Trelease
Susan I. McMahon United States
James A. Rycik United States
Laura S. Pardo United States
Maryann Manning United States
Monica Glina United States
Laurie Elish‐Piper relative to Virginia J. Goatley United States Virginia J. Goatley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Virginia J. Goatley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laurie Elish‐Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurie Elish‐Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurie Elish‐Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurie Elish‐Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurie Elish‐Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurie Elish‐Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurie Elish‐Piper. The network helps show where Laurie Elish‐Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Laurie Elish‐Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laurie Elish‐Piper Line = papers co-authored together Laurie Elish‐Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20201
2 20190
3 20193
4 20179
5 20163
6 201527
7 201421
8
Invisibility: An Unintended Consequence of Standards, Tests, and Mandates.
20133
9 201144
10 201061
11 201031
12
Scaffolding the English Canon with Linked Text Sets.
20094
13 20093
14 200714
15 20060
16 20050
17
Primary-Grade Educators and Adult Literacy: Some Strategies for Assisting Low-Literate Parents.
20028
18 20005
19 19977
20
Balanced Reading Instruction: Teachers' Visions and Voices.
19975

About Laurie Elish‐Piper

Laurie Elish‐Piper is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (6 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (5 papers), Education Systems and Policy (4 papers), Education and Technology Integration (3 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (2 papers) and Education Methods and Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (167 citations), Education (274 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (76 citations). Laurie Elish‐Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rita M. Bean, M. Cecil Smith, Jerry L. Johns, Barbara A. Marinak, Evan Ortlieb, Virginia J. Goatley, Pamela Mason, Jack Cassidy, Elizabeth G. Sturtevant and Victoria J. Risko. Their work appears in journals such as The Elementary School Journal, The Reading Teacher and Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026