Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Funders' positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs' crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion
2016382 citationsBlakley C. Davis, Keith M. Hmieleski et al.Journal of Business Venturingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph E. Coombs
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph E. Coombs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph E. Coombs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph E. Coombs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph E. Coombs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph E. Coombs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph E. Coombs. The network helps show where Joseph E. Coombs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph E. Coombs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph E. Coombs.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph E. Coombs based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph E. Coombs. Joseph E. Coombs is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Davis, Blakley C., Keith M. Hmieleski, Justin W. Webb, & Joseph E. Coombs. (2016). Funders' positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs' crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing. 32(1). 90–106.382 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Miao, Chao & Joseph E. Coombs. (2015). BIOLOGICAL FACTORS, INDIVIDUAL TRAITS, AND ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTIONS: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL SELF-EFFICACY AND NEED FOR COGNITION (SUMMARY). Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 35(4). 8.2 indexed citations
6.
Davis, Blakley C., Justin W. Webb, & Joseph E. Coombs. (2014). FUNDER DECISION-MAKING: THE ROLE OF PRODUCT CREATIVITY, ENTREPRENEURIAL PASSION, AND POSITIVE AFFECT (SUMMARY). Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 34(3). 1.1 indexed citations
Trahms, Cheryl A., Joseph E. Coombs, & Murray R. Barrick. (2010). DOES BIOLOGY MATTER ? HOW PRENATAL TESTOSTERONE, ENTREPRENEUR RISK PROPENSITY, AND ENTREPRENEUR RISK PERCEPTIONS INFLUENCE VENTURE PERFORMANCE. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. 30(5). 4.10 indexed citations
Coombs, Joseph E., et al.. (2009). Two Decades of International Entrepreneurship Research: What Have We Learned Where Do We Go from Here?. International journal of entrepreneurship. 13. 23.57 indexed citations
Coombs, Joseph E., Abbie J. Shipp, & Lisa Jones Christensen. (2008). ENTREPRENEUR AS CHANGE AGENT: ANTECEDENTS AND MODERATORS OF INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL PHILANTHROPIC BEHAVIOR. SSRN Electronic Journal. 28(21). 1.3 indexed citations
Coombs, Joseph E., Ram Mudambi, & David Deeds. (2004). An Examination of the Investments in US Biotechnology Firms By Foreign and Domestic Corporate Partners. UST Research Online (University of St. Thomas - Minnesota).9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.