Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

1.5k papers and 196.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice in the last decades have received a total of 196.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice usually cover Management of Technology and Innovation (1.1k papers), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (704 papers) and Accounting (693 papers) specifically the topics of Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (1.1k papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (651 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (480 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice are Jeffrey G. Covin, James J. Chrisman, Johan Wiklund, Norris Krueger, Dean A. Shepherd, Jess H. Chua, Danny Miller, Donald F. Kuratko, Friederike Welter and Candida G. Brush.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025