Jo‐Anne Kelder

654 total citations
59 papers, 367 citations indexed

About

Jo‐Anne Kelder is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Jo‐Anne Kelder has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 367 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Education, 7 papers in Computer Science Applications and 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Jo‐Anne Kelder's work include Higher Education Learning Practices (15 papers), Higher Education and Employability (12 papers) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (8 papers). Jo‐Anne Kelder is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Learning Practices (15 papers), Higher Education and Employability (12 papers) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (8 papers). Jo‐Anne Kelder collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Jo‐Anne Kelder's co-authors include Joseph Crawford, Andrea Carr, Alisa Percy, JT Walls, Gail Wilson, Michael Cowling, Brian F. Yates, Kathleen Doherty, Paul Turner and James C. Vickers and has published in prestigious journals such as The Leadership Quarterly, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

Jo‐Anne Kelder

55 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

Jo‐Anne Kelder
Peter Williams United States
David C. Ensminger United States
Allen D. Truell United States
Jo McKenzie Australia
Dana Schwieger United States
Jo‐Anne Kelder
Citations per year, relative to Jo‐Anne Kelder Jo‐Anne Kelder (= 1×) peers Javier Vidal

Countries citing papers authored by Jo‐Anne Kelder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo‐Anne Kelder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo‐Anne Kelder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo‐Anne Kelder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo‐Anne Kelder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo‐Anne Kelder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo‐Anne Kelder. The network helps show where Jo‐Anne Kelder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jo‐Anne Kelder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jo‐Anne Kelder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jo‐Anne Kelder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jo‐Anne Kelder. Jo‐Anne Kelder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Choi-Lundberg, DL, Marie‐Louise Bird, Melanie Greenwood, et al.. (2024). Employability Learning and Teaching Research: A Twenty Year Structured Narrative Review. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 21(5). 3 indexed citations
2.
Crawford, Joseph, Gemma Lewis, & Jo‐Anne Kelder. (2024). Authentic student leadership development: structural equation model testing differences among student leader populations. 41(2). 191–201. 2 indexed citations
3.
Crawford, Joseph, et al.. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Authorship Editor Policy: ChatGPT, Bard Bing AI, and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 20(5). 31 indexed citations
4.
Jones, Colin, et al.. (2021). Changing teaching practice: The evolving purpose of the teacher in higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 18(6). 1–11. 2 indexed citations
5.
Walls, JT, et al.. (2018). Engaging in the ‘course efficiency’ discussion: national drivers and local responses. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 43(8). 1079–1091. 3 indexed citations
6.
Kelder, Jo‐Anne, Andrea Carr, & JT Walls. (2017). Curriculum Evaluation and Research Framework: facilitating a teaching team approach to curriculum quality. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
7.
Nash, Rosie, et al.. (2016). Surveys unite to provide current status of Assurance of Learning in Higher Education. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
8.
Acuña, Tina, Jo‐Anne Kelder, Glenn McDonald, & Amanda J. Able. (2016). Implementing the threshold learning outcomes for agriculture at two Australian universities. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 4 indexed citations
9.
Kelder, Jo‐Anne, Angela Carbone, JT Walls, et al.. (2015). Variations on PATS: Choices in the Design of a Peer Assisted Teaching Scheme. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
10.
Williams, A. Mark, et al.. (2015). A University's Competitive Edge: Developing Graduate Capabilities Using 360QP Quality Enhancement. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
11.
Carr, Andrea, et al.. (2014). An evidence-based approach to the design of a learning program: evaluating preliminary data sets. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research. 7(1). 201–216. 1 indexed citations
12.
King, Carolyn, Jo‐Anne Kelder, Kathleen Doherty, et al.. (2014). Designing for Quality: The Understanding Dementia MOOC.. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 12(2). 161–171. 16 indexed citations
13.
Brown, Natalie, et al.. (2013). A Message From The Chalk Face – What Casual Teaching Staff Tell Us They Want To Know, Access and Experience.. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 10(3). 10 indexed citations
14.
Roehrer, Erin, et al.. (2013). The place of 'surprising results' in research into an assessment design: using portfolios for evidence of individual contribution to group work. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
15.
Kelder, Jo‐Anne, Alison J. Canty, Andrea Carr, et al.. (2013). A learning place where a high-risk student cohort can succeed: curriculum, assessment and teacher recruitment. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 4 indexed citations
16.
King, Carolyn, Jo‐Anne Kelder, Robert Phillips, et al.. (2013). Something for Everyone: MOOC Design for Informing Dementia Education and Research. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 4 indexed citations
17.
Acuña, Tina, et al.. (2013). Developing Threshold Learning Outcomes for Agricultural Science. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education. 21(5). 54–66. 5 indexed citations
18.
Acuña, Tina, et al.. (2012). Aligning an Agricultural Science Curriculum with the national Science threshold learning outcomes. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 7. 3 indexed citations
19.
Jones, Susan, Brian F. Yates, & Jo‐Anne Kelder. (2012). Learning and teaching academic standards for science: Where are we now?. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 105–109. 6 indexed citations
20.
Kelder, Jo‐Anne & Paul Turner. (2005). People, Places and Things: Leveraging Insights from Distributed Cognition Theory to Enhance the User-Centered Design of Meteorological Information Systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 7(1). 77–92. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026