Natalie Brown

857 total citations
67 papers, 482 citations indexed

About

Natalie Brown is a scholar working on Education, Modeling and Simulation and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Brown has authored 67 papers receiving a total of 482 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Education, 7 papers in Modeling and Simulation and 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Natalie Brown's work include Education Systems and Policy (14 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (9 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (7 papers). Natalie Brown is often cited by papers focused on Education Systems and Policy (14 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (9 papers) and Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (7 papers). Natalie Brown collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. Natalie Brown's co-authors include Noleine Fitzallen, Kim Beswick, Jane Watson, Kitty te Riele, Jessica Woodroffe, Rosie Nash, Leanne Chalmers, Ieva Stupans, Jane Skalicky and Catherine M. McDonald and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Brown

60 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Brown Australia 13 309 62 44 43 42 67 482
Diana Coben United Kingdom 12 311 1.0× 75 1.2× 53 1.2× 53 1.2× 6 0.1× 52 505
Louis T. Mariano United States 13 256 0.8× 42 0.7× 89 2.0× 30 0.7× 22 0.5× 51 575
Hsun‐Yu Chan Taiwan 12 193 0.6× 29 0.5× 7 0.2× 75 1.7× 51 1.2× 45 467
Vaughan Byrnes United States 10 407 1.3× 61 1.0× 22 0.5× 136 3.2× 83 2.0× 20 567
Valerie Thompson United States 12 44 0.1× 32 0.5× 20 0.5× 30 0.7× 43 1.0× 36 397
Tony Thompson United States 9 184 0.6× 27 0.4× 28 0.6× 99 2.3× 39 0.9× 30 383
Barbara Edwards United States 9 269 0.9× 44 0.7× 122 2.8× 20 0.5× 34 0.8× 32 394
Miguel Ángel Montero Alonso Spain 12 194 0.6× 93 1.5× 28 0.6× 45 1.0× 52 1.2× 39 513
Amber G. Candela United States 5 141 0.5× 27 0.4× 32 0.7× 37 0.9× 25 0.6× 11 302

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Brown. The network helps show where Natalie Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Brown

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Brown. Natalie Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
MacDonald, A, et al.. (2019). Converging discipline perspectives to inform the design and delivery of STEAM teacher professional learning. UTAS Research Repository. 40(1). 67–88. 4 indexed citations
2.
MacDonald, A, et al.. (2018). Disrupting disciplines: Empowering students and teachers to drive STEAM teacher professional learning design. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
3.
Nash, Rosie, Ieva Stupans, Esther Lau, et al.. (2017). CPD Aligned to Competency Standards to Support Quality Practice. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). 12–12. 15 indexed citations
4.
Bossu, Carina, Sandra Wills, Shirley Alexander, et al.. (2016). A national strategy to promote Open Educational Practices in higher education in Australia. ASCILITE Publications. 70–75. 3 indexed citations
5.
Nash, Rosie, Leanne Chalmers, Ieva Stupans, & Natalie Brown. (2015). A reciprocal relationship: informing a profession's competency standards. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
6.
Brown, Natalie. (2015). Classroom readiness: Complex, collaborative and continuing. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 3 indexed citations
7.
Nash, Rosie, Leanne Chalmers, Natalie Brown, SL Jackson, & Gregory M. Peterson. (2015). An international review of the use of competency standards in undergraduate pharmacy education. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 18 indexed citations
8.
Brown, Natalie. (2013). Research and Development in Higher Education: Connections in Higher Education. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 17 indexed citations
9.
Brown, Natalie, et al.. (2013). A Message From The Chalk Face – What Casual Teaching Staff Tell Us They Want To Know, Access and Experience.. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 10(3). 10 indexed citations
10.
Harvey, Marina, et al.. (2012). Connecting quality learning and teaching with sessional staff standards: The BLASST project. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 1 indexed citations
11.
Beswick, Kim, Jane Watson, Natalie Brown, Rosemary Callingham, & Suzie Wright. (2011). Student attitude change associated with teacher professional learning in Mathematics. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
12.
Watson, Jane, Kim Beswick, Natalie Brown, et al.. (2011). Digging into Australian Data with Tinkerplots. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
13.
Brown, Natalie, Jane Watson, & Suzie Wright. (2011). Science and numeracy in the Australian curriculum: Measurement activities for the middle years. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 3 indexed citations
14.
Watson, Jane, Natalie Brown, Suzie Wright, & Jane Skalicky. (2011). Discovery a Middle-school Classroom Inquiry: Estimating the Height of a Tree. ˜The œAustralian mathematics teacher. 67(2). 14. 1 indexed citations
15.
Watson, Jane, Natalie Brown, Suzie Wright, & Jane Skalicky. (2011). A Middle-School Classroom Inquiry: Estimating the Height of a Tree.. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 67(2). 14–21. 2 indexed citations
16.
Brown, Natalie, et al.. (2010). Tertiary Numeracy Enquiry. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 5 indexed citations
17.
Watson, Jane, Kim Beswick, Natalie Brown, Rosemary Callingham, & Suzie Wright. (2010). Student Change Associated with Professional Learning in Mathematics. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 602–609. 1 indexed citations
18.
Brown, Natalie. (2010). Adopting new practice: Using Feedback to Develop a University-wide Moderation Process that closes the assessment loop. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 2 indexed citations
19.
Brown, Natalie, et al.. (2008). Using a Cross-Institutional Collaborative Model to Deliver a National Roundtable Conference on Assessment: A Case Study. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 5(1). 1–18. 6 indexed citations
20.
Fitzallen, Noleine & Natalie Brown. (2006). What profiling tells us about ICT and professional practice. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026